SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 390

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Prashanta Laskar - Appellant
Versus
Debabrata Laskar And 8 Ors. - Respondent
Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 1 of 2018
Decided On : 13-01-2022

The Additional District Judge possesses equivalent powers to a District Judge in judicial matters, including granting Probate Certificates, as per the Indian Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 299 - Jurisdiction of Additional District Judge - The Additional District Judge dismissed an application for Probate on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, a finding deemed misconceived as Additional District Judges hold equivalent powers to District Judges as per Article 236 of the Constitution. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Administrative Powers - The Additional District Judge retains authority within the district and is competent to grant Probate Certificates. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The appellant sought a Probate Certificate, but the application was dismissed by the Additional District Judge on jurisdictional grounds, asserting that only the District Judge could grant such a certificate.

Findings of Court:
The learned Additional District Judge was found to have jurisdiction to entertain the probate application as per constitutional provisions.

Issues: The primary issue was the judicial authority of the Additional District Judge in granting a Probate Certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that under the Constitution, the Additional District Judge has full powers equivalent to those of the District Judge, and the dismissal of the application was legally unsound.

Result: The judgment of the Additional District Judge is set aside, and the application must be reconsidered on its merits.

Table of Content
1. probate application procedure details (Para 1 , 2)
2. jurisdiction of additional district judge regarding probate (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. setting aside previous judgment and ruling on appeal (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. SC Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. None appears for the respondents despite receipt of notice.

1. This is an appeal filed under Section 299 of the Indian SUCCESSION ACT , 1925 read with Section 96 and Order XLI Rule 1 CPC against the judgment and order dated 13.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, West Tripura, Sonamura in case No. T.S. (Probate) 01 of 2017.

2. The short question involves in this appeal is that the appellant herein filed an application for granting Probate Certificate in favour of him. The application had been admitted into the court of learned Additional District Judge, Sonamura. Summons were issued to the respondents. They appeared. Issues were framed. Evidences were recorded. Thereafter, having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, the learned Additional District Judge, Sonamura, dismissed the application on the sole ground that the Additional District Judge has no jurisdiction to grant Probate Certificate and the jurisdiction only lies with the District Judge of the said District.

3. When the judgment was passed, the court of Additional District Judge, Sonamura was within West Tripura Judicial District, and because of the said fact learned Additional District Judge, Sonamura, held that the Additional District Judge has no jurisdiction to entertain the said application for granting Certificate of Probate. In my opinion, the said finding of the learned Additional District Judge is misconceived and not in accordance with law.

4. The District Judge of a Judicial District is the Administrative Head of the said Judicial District in regard to affairs of the courts. The Additional District Judge has all the powers which the District Judge can exercise in discharge of his judicial duties and functions. Moreso, Article 236 of the Constitution of India deals with interpretation clause, which reads as under:

'236. Interpretation- In this Chapter-

(a) the expression 'district judge' includes judge of a city civil court, additional district judge, joint district judge, assistant district judge, chief judge of a small cause court, chief presidency magistrate, additional chief presidency magistrate, sessions judge, additional sessions judge and assistant sessions judge;

(b) the expression 'judicial service' means a service consisting exclusively of persons intended to fill the post of district judge and other civil judicial posts inferior to the post of district judge.'

5. A plain reading of this provision of the Constitution makes it clear that under Indian Constitution the Additional District Judge is equated with that of District Judge in respect of judicial powers and functions.

6. In view of the aforesaid discussion in short, in my considered view, the finding of the learned Additional District Judge, Sonamura that he has no jurisdiction to entertain an application for granting Certificate of Probate is contrary to law. Accordingly, I direct the learned Additional District Judge, Sonamura to admit the application afresh and decide the suit in accordance with law on merit as because he has ample power and jurisdiction to dispose of the matter.

7. Consequently, the judgment and order dated 13.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, West Tripura, Sonamura in case No. T.S. (Probate) 01 of 2017 stands set-aside and quashed.

8. With the above observation and direction, the instant appeal stands allowed and disposed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top