SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 174

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, Arindam Lodh, JJ.
Ratan Das - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura - Respondent
Crl. A(J) No. 6 of 2021
Decided On : 06-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. P.K. Biswas, Sr. Advocate, Mr. P. Majumder, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R. Datta, Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent

The prosecution failed to prove charges of dowry harassment and murder beyond a reasonable doubt, with reliance on indirect witness testimony and inconsistent statements.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498A, 306, and 304A - Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence for dowry harassment resulting in suicide - The learned Trial Court convicted the appellant for harassment and attempted murder, sentencing him to imprisonment for a total of 10 years - Prosecution's case relied heavily on testimonies of related witnesses and one dying declaration - No direct evidence of the alleged assault; witness testimonies were inconsistent - Material contradictions undermine the credibility of testimonies. (Paras 8, 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of subjecting his wife to dowry-related torture, leading to her setting herself on fire resulting in her death along with their infant child. The appellant's request for household items allegedly unmet led to physical abuse. The victim reportedly made a dying declaration stating she set the fire herself. (Paras 1, 2, 5, 20)

Findings of Court:
The court found the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of direct witnesses and inconsistencies in the testimonies. The Trial Court judgment was set aside, and the appellant was granted liberty. (Paras 22, 23)

Issues: Whether the evidence presented constituted valid charges under IPC Sections 498A, 306, and 304B, and the reliability of the victim’s dying declaration. (Para 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court found insufficient proof of the alleged offences, stating that indirect witness statements were inadmissible in establishing guilt, and emphasized that the medical evidence cannot be solely relied upon for convictions rather than suicides. (Paras 21, 22)

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction set aside.

Table of Content
1. appellant's conviction and sentencing details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments and evidence challenges presented by the appellant (Para 6 , 8)
3. court's consideration of arguments and evidence (Para 9 , 10)
4. analysis of evidence and conviction standards (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court's decision to overturn the conviction (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This instant criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 12.03.2021 & 15.03.2021 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5, West Tripura, Agartala, in case No. S.T.(T-1)33 of 2016, convicting the appellant under Section 498-A of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3(three) years and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-with default stipulation. Further convicted him under Section 306 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and sentenced him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- with default stipulation. Further convicted him under Section 304A of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and sentenced him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 10(ten) years with a direction that the sentences shall run concurrently.

2. The facts of the case in brief, which may be relevant for the present purpose and manifest on the record are that one Sri Sunil Biswas lodged a written complaint against his son-in-law and in-laws of her daughter, Smt. Supriya Biswas alleging inter alia that his daughter was married to Sri Ratan Das, the convict-appellant herein in the year 2013 and was residing in the matrimonial home situated at Badharghat, Matripalli. The appellant herein namely, Ratan Das demanded a fridge (refrigerator) and steel almirah but it could not be fulfilled by the complainant. On 11.06.2015, it was alleged that Supriya Biswas (now deceased) was severely beaten up and on 12.06.2015, in the morning at about 5.00 a.m., the appellant and others set her on fire.

3. Based on the aforesaid complaint, an FIR was registered before the O/C East Agartala Women P.S., as FIR No. 2015/WAW/031 dated 12/06/2015 under sections 498A/307/326/34 of IPC against the convict appellant herein and 3 ors.

4. On the basis of that FIR police took up investigation and on completion of the investigation filed a charge sheet against the appellant for offence punishable under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the IPC. As the case was exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions Judge, the same was committed to the Court of learned Sessions Judge. Subsequently, the case was transferred to the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5, West Tripura, Agartala. After hearing the prosecution as well as the defence and on the perusal of the papers submitted by the police, the learned Trial Court framed charges against the accused persons for the offence punishable under Section 498A/304B/34 of IPC and alternatively under Section 306 of IPC, to which the accused persons pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5. To prove the charges, the prosecution examined as many as 13 witnesses including the complainant and the investigating officer and they were also cross-examined. Thereafter, after the closure of the evidence, the accused persons were examined under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. After hearing the arguments of both sides, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5, West Tripura, Agartala by his judgment dated 12.03.2021 convicted the appellant as stated above.

6. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5, West Tripura, Agartala by his Judgment dated 12.03.2021, the appellant herein filed this instant appeal and prayed for the following reliefs:-

'i. Admit the appeal;

ii. Call for the records of Case No.S.T.(T-1)33 of 2016 from the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5 West Tripura, Agartala;

iii. Issue notice upon the respondent;

AND

iv.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top