Back
T. AMARNATH GOUD
Basu Maan Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura And 2 Others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Sharma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the respondents.
2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has sought for redress of his grievance arising out of not counting his past service rendered by him in Karimganj College, Assam as Assistant Professor w.e.f. 19.09.2001 to 20.01.2020 before his joining in the same post under the Higher Education Department, Government of Tripura. The petitioner has urged before this court for necessary direction from the Hon'ble High Court upon the respondents for counting the past service rendered by the petitioner for all purposes.
3. The facts are mostly undisputed. The fact of the petitioner is that the petitioner is serving as Assistant Professor under the respondent No.2-The Director of Higher Education, Government of Tripura being posted at Netaji Subhas Mahavidyalaya, Udaipur, Gomati Tripura.
4. Initially, the petitioner joined in Karimganj College as permanent lecturer in the Department of Chemistry on 19.09.2001 in the pre-revised UGC pay scale of Rs.8000-13,500/-. Thereafter, the s
The court ruled that a break in service of 85 days disqualified the petitioner from counting his past service for benefits, emphasizing adherence to proper application channels as required under UGC ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of completing a minimum qualifying service of 10 years for pension eligibility, as per the relevant statutes and precedents.
Past service in temporary roles can be counted for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme, aligning with UGC regulations; denial of such benefits violates legal rights.
prohibits State Government from interfering with the internal administration of the University in absence of any provision made in the Act itself the decision of the University itself that they will ....
The court affirmed that an employee appointed before the New Pension Scheme is entitled to benefits under the Old Pension Scheme, regardless of any undertaking given under duress.
Past temporary services of employees must be considered for pension calculation under the Bihar Pension Rules, ensuring fair treatment and preventing undue hardship.
Eligibility for pension benefits requires continuous service without voluntary breaks; prior service in different institutions does not automatically qualify unless condoned.
Past services in private institutions must be counted for Career Advancement Scheme eligibility, and subsequent Executive Councils cannot revoke earlier decisions without lawful basis.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
