HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Prashanta Kumar Pal & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Bar Council of India, Represented Through Its Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 485 of 2022
Decided On : 19-07-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to challenge voter list resolution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue inclusion of non-member in voter list. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. respondents defend legality of voter list and membership. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 4. court clarifies voting rights and membership conditions. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. M. Chakraborty, learned senior counsel assisted by Mrs. P. Chakraborty and Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned G.A. & Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. This present writ petition has been filed under Article-226 of the Constitution of India for directing the respondents to transmit the record, relevant to the subject matter of the writ petition for quashing the resolution dated 20.05.2022 passed by the respondent No.4 also quashing the decision of the respondent No.4 to finalize the voter list keeping the name of the respondent No.11 and thereupon forwarding of the same to the respondent No.2 for approval. The petitioner also prayed to delete the name of the respondent No.11 from the resolved voter list and refraining the respondents No. 2 and 4 from acting in any manner in furtherance of the resolution dated 20.05.2022, forwarding the approved voter list by the respondent No.4 to the respondent No.2 for publication of the final voter list.
3. The brief facts of the present are that on 10.03.2022, the respondent No.2 i.e. the Bar Council of Tripura had sent one supplementary draft of voter list to the Bar Association i.e. the respondent No.4 incorporating the name of the respondent No.11 at Sl. No.1 along with another name. Therefore, accordingly the respondent No.4 had published the draft voter list. From bare perusal of the draft voter list, it becomes apparent that the name of the respondent No.11 is not enrolled with the Bar Council of Tripura, which is a prima facie condition for being a 'Member' of the Bar Association with voting right. Faced with such situation, on 04.04.2022, the petitioners had raised a written objection before the respondent No.4 against such inclusion of name. pursuant to such objection being raised, the Bar Association has hold its meeting, the Executive Body of the Tripura High Court Bar Association by resolution dated 20.05.2022 had resolved to keep the name of the respondent No.11 in the final voter list and has also sent the same to the respondent No.2 on 30.05.2022 for approval and publication of final voter list. Hence, this petition.
4. Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the cause of action of this petition has arisen from the publication of the draft voter list of the Tripura High Court Bar Association for the year 2022 by the respondent No.4. In the month of February, 2022 the respondent No.4 had sought the draft voter list from the Bar Council of Tripura for the purpose of conducting election of the Bar Association for the year 2022. On 10.03.2022, the respondent No.2 i.e. the Bar Council of Tripura had sent one supplementary draft voter list to the Bar Association i.e. the respondent No.4 incorporating the name of the respondent No.11 at Sl. No.1 along with another name and subsequently, published the draft voter list.
5. He has contended that the respondent No.11 is not enrolled with the Bar Council of Tripura, which is a prima facie condition for being a 'Member' of the Bar Association with voting right. Thereafter, on 04.04.2022 the petitioners had raised a written objection before the respondent No.4 against such illegalities. Later on, on 28.04.2022, the respondent No.2 resolved the dispute and confirmed the respondent No.4 that the respondent N
K. Krishna Murthy (Dr.) and others vs. Union of India and another
Mohan Lal Tripathi vs. District Magistrate, Rai Bareilly and others
The right to vote in Bar Association elections is governed by membership rules, not as a fundamental right, and non-compliance with enrolment requirements invalidates such rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Bar Association is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for an election ....
The Court mandates the principles of 'one advocate one vote' and 'one advocate one chamber' for Bar Associations in Delhi to ensure representative elections and proper chamber allocation among practi....
Writ petitions challenging internal elections of Bar Associations are not maintainable as they do not involve public character or duties.
Writ petitions challenging internal election disputes in associations are not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that objections to the provisional voters list for co-operative society elections must be within the jurisdiction of the Election Officer and must ....
Writ petitions against the Registrar General must be heard by a Division Bench, and relief cannot be granted without proper jurisdiction and due process.
The failure to meet eligibility criteria for the Treasurer position based on practice years invalidated the nomination; compliance with Central Election Committee's directives is mandatory.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.