SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 159

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Pradip Brata Roy – Appellant
Versus
Manabala Rudra Paul – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. De, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Respondent

Table of Content
1. establishing facts of ownership and loan agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. background of appeal and trial court's decision. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. substantial questions raised by the appellant. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. arguments presented by both counsels. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. court's assessment of arguments and limitations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. final judgment and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the CPC preferred against the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2019 and 24.09.2019 respectively delivered by the District Judge, Khowai in T.A.08 of 2018 dismissing the judgment and decree passed in T.S.02 of 2012 dated 18.07.2018.

2. The brief fact of the case is that the plaintiffs have some portion of land measuring 9 gandas in total nearby their homestead at Karoilong which they have inherited from deceased Narendra Chandra Rudra Paul as described in Schedule-A of the plaint. In the year 2002-2003, due to dire need of money, the plaintiff approached the defendant No.2 for loan amounting to Rs.20,000/- which the defendant No.2 had given the plaintiff on taking her thumb impression on a paper narrating and explaining her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top