HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
I. Mahanty, CJ., S.G. Chattopadhyay, J.
Court On Its Own Motion - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (C) (PIL) 22/2021
Decided On : 05-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. registration of suo motu pil based on violence reports. (Para 1) |
| 2. state's response to violence and maintenance of law. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. affidavits filed detailing investigation and compensation efforts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. updates on legal proceedings and compensation distribution. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. closure of the matter with directives to the state. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This suo motu public interest litigation came to be registered on the basis of newspaper reports published in various national and local dailies reporting the widespread violence which occurred in North Tripura district, Unakoti district and Sepahijala district in Tripura on 26th October, 2021.
2. On 29.10.2021, when the matter was first taken up, learned Advocate General submitted a brief note before the Court indicating various steps taken by the State Government to prevent the spread of violence and book the perpetrators of the crime. Having considered the said note of the learned Advocate General and the submissions made by him, the following order was passed by this Court on 29.10.2021:
'After the learned Advocate General brought to our notice the developments as noted hereinabove, the Court indicated to the learned Advocate General its sole concern i.e. the protection of life, liberty and property of all citizens of Tripura. There can be no reiteration that the State owes its responsibilities insofar as maintenance of law and order as well as providing citizens with the security to protect their life, livelihood as well as their properties. Today's local newspapers of Tripura indicate that an uneasy calm is prevalent and no repetition of the occurrences which took place on 26th October, 2021 has yet taken place. It is further informed that all necessary steps are being taken by the State to ensure that such occurrences are not repeated.
While taking note of the developments as noted hereinabove, this Court also considers it appropriate to take note of the fact that various peace committees have been formed in various locations where communal strife exists. While commending such efforts on the part of the state, this Court also commends the steps taken by various political parties to restore peace and order within the state. These steps, in our considered view, will go a long way in regaining the confidence of the citizens at large. However, these steps need to be further expanded. Accordingly, the state may consider forming peace committees not only at district levels but also at sub-divisional levels and if necessary at panchayat levels as well and we call upon all political parties to participate fully in such peace process so that confidence of the people of the state can be restored and the underlying strife that exists can be suitably dealt with.
Various cases have been registered pursuant to the violence that took place on 26th October, 2021 and incidence which took place prior thereto. We call upon the state to file an affidavit stating the stages at which the investigation is going on and as to whether any accused has been apprehended in such manner.
This Court also takes into notice of the fact that the Hon'ble Chief Minister of the State has reported in the local press yesterday as well as today that he has directed the officials concerned to compute the damages that have occurred and to immediately see the compensation as deemed appropriate is granted to them. We direct the state to take urgent action in this regard so that the livelihood of persons who have lost their source of income can be restored at the earliest.
In this regard, we wish to record our appreciation of the media at large, in particular the print media who appear to have taken up a very active positive role in trying to restore peace and order within the state. We assert that the media shall remain vigilant at all time and continue discharging its duty in a responsible manner which it has already ex
AI
The court emphasized the state's duty to protect citizens' rights, ensure investigations and compensation for violence victims, and establish mechanisms to prevent future communal strife.
(1) Sectarian violence and strife in Manipur – Clashes between Kuki and Meitei Communities – Victims of violence must receive remedial measures irrespective of their community – There is a pressing n....
The court mandated effective investigation under the SC ST Act and recognized the right to compensation for victims, emphasizing the necessity for immediate state response to tribal safety and justic....
The court's decision emphasized the need for an impartial inquiry, victim and witness protection, and infrastructure improvements in response to the reported incidents in Sandeshkhali.
Bangal Elections - Post-poll violence - Preventive actions - Investigating agency constituted by the court and the CBI to conduct investigation and maintain integrity, impartiality, honesty and good ....
The government is obligated to implement the recommendations of a Commission once accepted, and must provide timely compensation and legal aid to victims.
A public servant, while discharging official duties, cannot be prosecuted without prior sanction; allegations lacking credible evidence, particularly injury, support quashing criminal proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.