SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 265

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Usha Rani Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.G. Chakraborty, Advocate., for the Appellant; S. Debnath, Addl. P.P., for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 29.06.2016 passed by the Additional Session Judge, West Tripura in Session Trial (Type-1) 01/2015 whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 326-A of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and further sentenced to pay a sum of Rs. 20,000/- in default stipulation and to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for six months.

2. The genesis of the prosecution is rooted in the written complaint filed by one Smt. Pusparani Debnath [PW-1] alleging that her son namely Babul Debnath [the victim] has married one Smt. Usha Rani Debnath of local are Laxamandhepa as per Hindu Rites and Customs. After their marriage two sons were born. For the last one year, the said daughter-in-law of her namely Smr. Usha Rani Debnath was reluctant in discharging any household works in her matrimonial home and she also did not take care of her minor child. Due to that reason, some conjugal disputes arose between the accused and her husband and also quarrel with her mother-in-law. On 30.09.2014 at about 5:00 hours when Babul Debnath was lying in bed suddenly accused Usha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top