Back
ARINDAM LODH
Aparajita Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for relief on examination results. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegation of mark deductions based on cbse guidelines. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion on marks computation method for students. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. clarification of the school's adherence to cbse guidelines. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's assessment of expert committee's findings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. result of writ petition. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. A. Debbarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Datta Majudmer, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. T. Halam appearing for the respondent no.2, Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 and Mr. B. Majumder, learned Asstt. S.G. appearing for the respondent nos.1 and 4.
2. By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
'Under the circumstances stated above, it is submitted, that the Hon'ble High Court would be kind enough to:-
(I) Issue rules upon the Respondents to show cause as to why writ in the nature of Mandamus and direction of like nature shall not
Educational institutions must adhere to standardized evaluation guidelines as established by overseeing bodies, and courts should respect the decisions made by expert committees in academic assessmen....
The court confirmed the legitimacy of students' expectations against retrospective alteration of assessment criteria impacting their academic prospects, while clarifying that judgments must be stable....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Board is empowered to correct an erroneous result within six months from its declaration, as per Rule 102(2) of the Maharashtra Secondary ....
Exam results cannot be cancelled without direct evidence of unfair means; lack of due process and discrimination in similar treatment of candidates violates principles of justice.
Prescribing the academic standards falls exclusively in the domain of special bodies like the Senate, Board of Governors and Syndicate etc. The court would normally not interfere with such prescribed....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
