SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Tri) 44

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ, BISWAJIT PALIT, J.
Sahajahan Majumdar - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura - Respondent
C.R.P. Nos. 44, 45, 46, 47 of 2023
Decided On : 06-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Biplabendu Roy
For the Respondent: K. De

Assessments beyond five years are invalid without proper notice, and best judgment assessments require rejection of returns, which was not adhered to in this case.

Headnote:(A) TVAT Act, 2004 - Sections 31(1), 33, 25(4)(d), and 75A - Revision petition concerning assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18 - Common order remanding matters for fresh assessment and penalty - No notice issued for assessment year 2014-15, making the assessment beyond five years unsustainable - Tax liability for 2015-16 and 2016-17 already deposited, rendering remand for penalty meaningless - Assessment for 2017-18 found to lack basis as returns were not rejected, necessitating remand for fresh assessment. (Paras 4, 10, 11, and 12)

(B) Limitation - Assessment beyond five years barred under Section 33 of the TVAT Act - No notice under Section 31(1) invalidates assessment for 2014-15. (Paras 4 and 11)

(C) Best Judgment Assessment - Requirement for rejection of returns before proceeding with best judgment assessment not met, leading to unsustainable turnover determination. (Paras 6 and 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the common order dated 15th October, 2022, which remanded matters for assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18, following an earlier remand for alternative remedy. The Assessing Authority had imposed tax, interest, and penalty, which were contested.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the revisional order for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17, and remanded the matter for fresh assessment for 2017-18, finding the previous assessment unsustainable.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the assessment for 2014-15 due to lack of notice and the appropriateness of the turnover determination for 2017-18.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that assessments beyond five years are barred without proper notice, and that a best judgment assessment requires rejection of returns, which was not done here.

Result: Revision petitions allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Biplabendu Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also heard K. De, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.

2. The present revision petition (CRP No.44 of 2023) under Section 72 of the TVAT Act, 2004 relates to the assessment year 2017-2018 (i.e. April, May and June 2017). By the common impugned order dated 15th October, 2022, the learned Commissioner of Taxes, respondent No.3 herein has decided the revision petitions in respect of assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18. The matter was earlier remanded for the petitioner to avail alternative remedy vide order dated 7th March, 2022 passed in WP(C) No.221 of 2022. The Assessing Authority had by the order dated 29.07.2019 imposed tax, interest and penalty upon the petitioner which was challenged in revision under Section 70(2) of the TVAT Act, 2004 before the learned Commissioner of Taxes after liberty granted by this Court. The revision petitions have been decided vide order dated 15th October, 2022 by remanding the matters relating to A.Y. 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 on the question of imposition of penalty after due notice whereas the matters relating to the period 2014-15 was remanded to the Assessing Authority to take a fresh decision after due notice. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred a review petition under Section 74 of the TVAT Act, 2004 which was dismissed on 11th May, 2023. Petitioner has approached this Court through the instant revision petition under Section 72 of the TVAT Act, 2004 and also invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India. By order dated 24th January, 2024, delay of 239 days in preferring the instant revision petitions was condoned in terms of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 relying upon the decision rendered by the Apex Court in case of Superintending Engineer/Dehar Power House Circle Bhakra Beas Management Board (PW) Slapper and another vs. Excise and Taxation Officer, Sunder Nagar/Assessing Authority(2020) 17 SCC 692.

3. CRP No.45 of 2023 relates to the assessment year 2016-17; CRP No.46 of 2023 relates to the assessment year 2015-16 and CRP No.47 of 2023 relates to the assessment year 2014-15. Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents though no rejoinder has been filed. When the matter was heard on 28th November, 2024, learned Additional Government Advocate was asked to show as to whether notice under Section 31(1) of TVAT Act, 2004 for the relevant tax period 2014-15 had been issued by the Assessing Authority since a common assessment order was passed on 29th July, 2019 covering periods 2014-15 to 2017-18 (up to June, 2017). Notice under Section 31(1) for the tax periods 2015-16 to 2017-18 (up to June, 2017) is dated 13th February, 2019 (Annexure-3 to CRP No.44 of 2023) i.e. the present revision petition. The Commissioner of Taxes has by the common impugned order dated 15th October, 2022 remanded the matter for passing fresh assessment order in respect of tax period 2014-15 whereas remitted the matter for the remaining years 2015-16 to 2017-18 on the question of imposition of penalty after due notice. Learned counsel for the revenue was also asked to obtain the assessment records for the relevant assessment years as certified to be true for assistance to the Court on the next date.

4. Mr. K. De, learned counsel for the revenue has on the basis of instructions and the records of the assessment proceedings submitted that no notice under Section 31(1) was issued for the tax period 2014-15. The same is also reflected in the revisional order. Therefore, the revisional order so far as it relates to 2014-15 is not sustainable in law as the proceedings for assessment beyond five years is barred by Section 33 of the TVAT Act, 2004 . Section 33 of the TVAT Act is extracted hereunder:

"33. No assessment after five years :-

(1) No assessment under section 31 and 32 shall be made after the expiry of five years from the end of the tax period to which the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top