HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA, AGARTALA
T. AMARNATH GOUD, J.
The Dean, Central Agriculture University, Lembuchara, Agartala, West Tripura – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Aparna Debnath, W/o. Sri Tapesh Debnath and Anr. – Respondents
LA.App. No. 04 of 2025
Decided On : 12-03-2025
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellant : Mr. B. Majumder, Dy.SGI.
JUDGMENT :
T. AMARNATH GOUD, J.
Heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned Dy. SGI appearing for the appellant. None appears for the respondents.
[2] This present appeal has been filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 , against the Judgment and Award dated 17.08.2024 passed in Civil Misc. (L.A) No. 02 of 2018 by the learned Land Acquisition Judge, West Tripura, Agartala.
[3] The brief facts of the case is that, the referring claimant’s (respondent no1. herein) land was acquired by the L. A Collector, (Respondent No.2 herein) by a notification No. F.9(19)-REV/SEQ/VI/08 dated 13.01.2009 under Section 4 of the L.A. Act, 1894 for the purpose of construction and development of Fishery College at Lembuchara under Sadar Sub-Division. The Compensation of the acquired land was assessed by the L.A. Collector, West Tripura, Agartala at the rate of Rs. 2,87,500/- per acre i.e. Rs. 1,15,000/- per kani and total amount of Rs. 3,22,441/- only with other statutory benefits was awarded in favour of the referring claimant. Being dissatisfied, the referring claimant prayed reference to the learned L.A. Judge, and accordingly, the same was referred to the court of learned L.A. Judge, West Tripura, Agartala. Thereafter, the learned L.A. Judge, West Tripura, Agartala after hearing both the parties, by its judgment dated 17.08.2024 has allowed the claim petition enhancing the award of compensation at the rate of Rs.7,00,000/- per kani and also awarded Rs. 10,00,000.00/- cost as of existing construction situated in the acquired land. Hence, this appeal. The relevant portion of the Judgment and Award dated 17.08.2024 passed in Civil Misc. (L.A) No. 02 of 2018 is quoted herein below:-
“ORDER
In the result, the application of the referring claimant Smti Aparna Debnath for enhancement of Award is allowed.
It is hereby directed that the referring claimant is entitled to get compensation @ Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh) only per kani for the acquired land. The referring claimant is also entitled to get a lump sum compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- towards the cost of existing construction on the acquired land. Referring claimant Smti Aparna Debnath shall also get 30% solatium and 12% further enhanced amount of compensation upon the said enhanced value of land computing from the date of notification under Section 4 of the L.A Act, 1894 till the date of Award by the L. A. Collector, or the date of taking possession of the acquired land whichever is earlier, as per Section 23 (2) and Section 23(1-A) of the L.A Act respectively. The referring claimant will further get interest @ 9% per annum from the date of taking over possession for one year and thereafter, @ 15% per annum after expiry of said one year time till the date of payment upon the enhanced amount of compensation as per Section 28 of the L.A Act/As per decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Mehrawal Khewaji Trust, Faridkot & Others Vrs. State of Punjub & Others, reported in 2012 AIR SCW 2822 , the interest will also be counted on additional amount as awarded under Section 23(1-A) of the L.A Act and upon the solatium awarded under Section 23 (2) of the Act.
The amount so paid earlier as compensation under Section 11 of the L.A Act shall be adjusted with the amount awarded by way of enhancement in this case………..”
[4] Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 17.08.2024 passed in Civil Misc (LA) Case No. 02 of 2018 by the Learned Land Acquisition Judge, West Tripura, Agartala, the appellant herein approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-
“(i) Admit the instant appeal;
(ii) Issue notice upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment/award dated 17.08.2024 passed in CM (L.A.) 02 of 2018 by the learned L.A. Judge, West Tripura, Agartala shall not be set-aside;
(iii) Call for the records of case no. CM.(L.A.) 02 of 2018 from the court of the learned L.A. Judge, West Tripura, Agartala.
AND
(iv) After hearing both the sides may kindly set aside the impugned judg
Valid ownership must be established for compensation claims under the Land Acquisition Act; unauthorized claimants are not entitled to public funds.
Compensation for land acquisition requires valid ownership documents; unauthorized claimants are not entitled to compensation.
Compensation claims require valid proof of ownership and alienable rights; mere revenue records are insufficient.
Claims for enhancement of compensation in land acquisition require clear evidence of ownership and title, which was absent in this case.
Compensation for land acquisition requires valid ownership established through title-deeds; mere possession is insufficient.
Compensation for acquired land requires proof of valid ownership; mere revenue records are insufficient to establish alienable rights.
Equal treatment in compensation determination for similar properties acquired under land acquisition law.
The principle of parity in compensation for acquired land mandates that similar cases receive consistent treatment, resulting in an enhancement of compensation to Rs.275/- per Sq. Ft.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.