IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
S.DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Renubala Nath W/o Shri Shib Charan Nath – Appellant
Versus
Bikash Ranjan Dutta S/on Late Amarendra Kumar Dutta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA, J.
1. The appeal arises out of the judgment dated 16.09.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in Title Appeal No.28 of 2016 by dismissing the appeal.
2 The appellant (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) instituted Title Suit No.24 of 2014 in the Court of the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Dharmanagar against the respondents (hereinafter referred to as the defendants) praying for a perpetual injunction for restraining the defendants, their men and agents from entering into the suit land and from disturbing the possession of the plaintiff therein in respect of the land measuring 0.04 acres of Class-Nal recorded in the Khatian No.743 of Mouja-Panisagar falling within R.S. Plot No.1331, corresponding to old CS Plot No.531/1008(P) with the following boundaries:
North : Self (plaintiff)
South : Foot track of village.
East : Biresh Das known as Biresh Sen
West : Assam-Agartala Road
3. The claim of the plaintiff is that she purchased the suit land from one Smt. Basana Rani Nath and others vide registered sale Deed No.1-3033 dated 15.12.2007 [Exbt.1 series] and since purchase she has been possessing the suit land peacef
A purchaser's established possession must be protected unless evicted legally, even if mapping errors exist, highlighting the integrity of possession against administrative mistakes.
Proper identification of property ownership is essential in disputes, and prior deeds must reflect accurate details to establish rightful title.
Possession of land, supported by historical rent receipts and acknowledgment by the ex-landlord, is sufficient to establish title, and municipal survey entries do not negate this title.
Revenue records do not confer title; civil courts lack jurisdiction over revenue matters, affirming the authority of revenue officials in correcting entries and ejecting trespassers.
A permanent injunction cannot be granted in a property dispute without a clear determination of the title to the property, especially when the claimant's possession is based on an unregistered agreem....
Settlement record of rights does not extinguish prior title, and collusive judgments lack binding authority on necessary parties.
The burden of proof lies with the defendant to substantiate claims over the disputed land, a failure results in dismissal of appeal.
Ownership and encroachment claims on land require clear proof and adherence to established records, emphasizing the necessity of addressing specific issues raised during the trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.