MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT
Prafulla C. Pant, Sudip Ranjan Sen, JJ.
Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Babuchandran Nair P. - Respondent
W.A. No. 14 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 162 of 2013, W.A. No. 15 of 2014 In W.P.(C) No. 257 of 2013, W.A. No. 16 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 123 of 2013, W.A. No. 17 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 193 of 2013, W.A. No. 18 of 2014 In W.P.(C) No. 124 of 2013, W.A. No. 19 of 2014 In W.P.(C) No. 216 of 2013, W.A. No. 20 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 122 of 2013, W.A. No. 21 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 192 of 2013 and W.A. No. 31 of 2014 in W.P.(C) No. 256 of 2013
Decided On : 11-07-2014
Nursing Allowance - Admissibility of Nursing Allowance to Nursing Staff of Assam Rifles - Order No. A/Pers/NA/2008 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the entitlement of nursing allowance to Nursing Assistants of Assam Rifles in light of order No. A/Pers/NA/2008, dated 22-9-2009 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General of Assam Rifles. The court also considered the applicability of the law laid down by the Apex Court in State of Madhya Pradesh and others vrs. Yogendra Shrivastava (2010) 12 SCC page 538 regarding the payment of arrears and allowance within a specific time period.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the admissibility of nursing allowance to Nursing Staff working as Nursing Assistants with Assam Rifles in light of order No. A/Pers/NA/2008, dated 22-9-2009 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General of Assam Rifles.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the writ petitioners, being Nursing Assistants, were covered within the expression 'Nursing Staff' and were entitled to the nursing allowance in terms of the order dated 22-9-2009. The court also held that the entitlement of nursing allowance prior to the period of three years from the date of filing of the writ petitions cannot be restricted in the present appeals.
Issues: The issues involved the admissibility of nursing allowance to Nursing Assistants of Assam Rifles and the applicability of the law laid down by the Apex Court regarding the payment of arrears and allowance within a specific time period.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the writ petitioners, being Nursing Assistants, were entitled to the nursing allowance in terms of the order dated 22-9-2009. The court also determined that the entitlement of nursing allowance prior to the period of three years from the date of filing of the writ petitions cannot be restricted in the present appeals.
Final Decision: The writ appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were allowed to comply with the impugned orders passed by the learned Single Judge within a period of 6 months from the date of the judgment.
Judgment
Prafulla C. Pant, CJ.1. In all these writ appeals, a common question is involved as to the admissibility of the nursing allowance to Nursing Staff who were working as Nursing Assistants with Assam Rifles in the light of order No. A/Pers/NA/2008, dated 22-9-2009 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General of Assam Rifles.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the papers on record.
3. Admittedly, the writ petitioners are/were the Nursing Assistants of Assam Rifles. The order No. A/Pers/NA/2008, dated 22-9-2009 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General of Assam Rifles, Shillong, reads as under:
Government of India
Ministry of Home Affairs
Directorate General of Assam Rifles
Shillong-793011.
A/Pers/NA/2008
22 Sep 2009
List-A, B, C, E & F
Payment Of Nursing Allowance To The
Nursing Personnel Of Cpf At The Rate
Applicable To The Nursing Personnel
Of Central Government Hospital.
It Is Intimated That Ministry Of Home Affairs Vide Their Letter No. Ii. 27011/44/2008-P Ii Dated 28 July 2009 (Copy Attached) Conveyed The Decision Of Extending Payment Of Nursing Allowance To The Nursing Staff Employed In The Central Government Hospital Of Cpfs. The Date Of Effect And The Rate Of Allowance Applicable To Nursing Staff (Asstt. Matron, Sister, Staff Nurse And Anm) Of Assam Rifles As Under:-
(A) Payment Of Nursing Allowance @ Rs. 300/- W.E.F. 01.08.1987 To 14.07.88.
(B) Payment Of Nursing Allowance @ Rs. 1600/- W.E.F. 15.07.1998 To 30.08.2009.
(C) Payment Of Nursing Allowance @ Rs. 3200/- W.E.F. 01.09.2008.
2. It Is Also Brought Out That, The Rate Of Nursing Allowance Shall Automatically Increase By 25% Every Time The Dearness Allowance Payable On The Revised Pay Structure Goes By 50%.
3. In View Of The Above, Sect Hqs And Bns Are Requested To Publish Pt-Ii Order In Respect Of The Effected Nursing Staff (Serving/Retired Or Died) For The Period W.E.F. 01 Sep 2008 To 30 Sep 2009 And Forward The Arrear Bills To Cpbo (Assam Rifles) For Checking And Necessary Payment.
4. Action taken in this regard be intimated to this Branch on priority.
(Babu Frances)
Col
Col(A)
For DG Assam Rifles.
4. Learned Single Judge in all the writ petitions from which these appeals have arisen, following the judgment and order dated 25-5-2012 passed by Division Bench of Gauhati High Court in WA No. 1 (SH) of 2011 directed that since the writ petitioners (present respondents) being Nursing Assistants are covered within the expression "Nursing Staff", as such, they are also entitled to the nursing allowance in terms of order dated 22-9-2009 quoted above.
5. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted before us that the appellants are confining the challenge to the impugned orders only to the extent that in view of law laid down by Apex Court in State of Madhya Pradesh and others vrs. Yogendra Shrivastava (2010) 12 SCC page 538, the arrears and allowance cannot be directed to be paid beyond a period of three years prior to filing of the writ petitions.
6. We have carefully gone through the above mentioned case law. In said case, the rules which allowed Non Practicing Allowance were of the year 1981 i.e. Madhya Pradesh Employees' State Insurance Service (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1981. The writ petitioners entered into service in 1982. They slept over their rights for a long period and filed the writ petitions only in the year 1998 (after more than fifteen years) and approached the Tribunal claiming Non Practicing Allowance. In that background, in view of the laches on their part, the Apex Court directed that the difference on Non Practicing Allowance claimed by the applicants before the Tribunal shall be paid not beyond the period of three years before the date of original applications filed by them before the Tribunal.
7. In the present case, facts are different as the order dated 22-9-2009 was issued making the employees entitled to nursing allowance w.e.f. 1-1-1997 as is apparent from the ord
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.