SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Megh) 121

MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT
Prafulla C. Pant, Sudip Ranjan Sen, JJ.
Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Kumar Singh - Respondent
WA No. 35 of 2013
Decided On : 30-05-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.C. Shyam, Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. R. Jha, Advocate.

Mandatory compliance of Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 before passing an order of major penalty for dismissal and the significance of providing an opportunity to defend before passing a dismissal order.

Headnote:

Dismissal - Service - Assam Rifles Manual Chapter VII (e), Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule-14, Rule-11 (2) - Rule-5 - Devendra Kumar vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors: (2013) 9 SCC 363

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitioner, a clerk with the Assam Rifles, was dismissed from service due to forged documents without being given an opportunity to defend himself. The court found that the dismissal order violated Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the dismissal order was passed in violation of Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 as no inquiry was held nor any opportunity was given to the writ petitioner to defend himself.

Issues: Violation of Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, absence of inquiry and opportunity to defend before dismissal order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory compliance of Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 before passing an order of major penalty for dismissal. It distinguished between 'discharge' and 'dismissal' and highlighted the significance of providing an opportunity to defend before passing a dismissal order.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ appeal and directed the respondents to pass an appropriate order under Assam Rifles Manual or to hold a departmental inquiry and give an opportunity to the writ petitioner before any order of major penalty is passed under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

Judgment

Prafulla C. Pant, CJ.

1. This writ appeal is directed against the Judgment & Order dated 1.07.2013 passed by the Learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 134 (SH) of 2012 whereby the said Court has quashed the order dated 31.10.08 dismissing the writ petitioner from service, and directed that the petitioner be reinstated.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused papers on records.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the writ petitioner C/4015273P Rect/Clk, Pankaj Kumar Singh was recruited as Clerk with the Assam Rifles. He was undergoing training in Assam Rifles Centre & School. On 31.10.08, the services of the writ petitioner were dismissed vide order dated 31.10.08 issued by the Commanding Officer under Assam Rifles Manual Chapter VII (e) and Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 [for short CCS (CCA) Rules]. Copy of the dismissal order which was annexed at Annexure-I to the writ petition discloses that the birth certificate of the writ petitioner was sent for verification and it was found to be forged and fake. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Singrauli, District Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh carried out an investigation and found that the residential certificate of the writ petitioner was also found to be forged.

4. The writ petitioner challenged the said order of dismissal on the ground that the said order was passed in violation of Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 as no inquiry was held nor any opportunity was given to the writ petitioner to defend himself. In the counter affidavit filed before the Learned Single Judge, the respondents have pleaded that verification report received from Tehsildar did not require any further verification and as such the order challenged by writ petitioner suffers from no illegality. The Learned Single Judge after hearing the parties found that the respondents (present appellants) failed to comply with Rule-14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 before passing order under Rule-11 (2) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, as such, dismissal order was liable to be quashed and the same was quashed.

5. On behalf of the appellant, attention of this Court has been drawn to Para-8 of the counter affidavit which reads as under:

8. That with regard to statement made in paragraphs 3(a),(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (i), (j), (k), (h), (I) and (m), it is respectfully submitted that as per the Assam Rifles Manual, 1994, Chapter VII enlistment and recruiting of the Assam Rifles Personnel, Rule-11 of Chapter VII is deleted and constituted as under:

(a) Verification roll of all recruits on enrolment to be initiated by the ARTC & S within 30 days from the date of enrolment after interrogation of rects by the training officer of their respective training battalions.

(b) If verification report is not received within the period of two months from the date of initiating, the first reminder will be issued to the Superintendent of Police.

(c) If report is not received within six months, a fresh verification roll of the rect. will be initiated by ARTC & S/Units where the individual is serving. If rect. is already posted out to a battalion, an intimation will be given by the ARTC & S to the concerned unit for progressing the case with the Civil authorities.

(d) Unverified rects should be warned by the OC unit and instruct them to obtain their verification report from the Civil authority in their own interest by liaison with Civil Police during their leave period.

(e) In case of adverse verification reports of any recruit from Civil authority, Commandant, ARTC & S S/OC Unit will discharge the recruit immediately.

(f) All possible efforts will be made by the ARTC & S/Battalions to get the verification report from Civil authority, where required and at the discretion of the DIG, ARTC & S/Units & S/Unit may depute a JCO/NCO on temporary duty to liaise with the Civil authority for this purpose. As such, the order of dismissal issued by the Commandant is in accordance with the Assam Rifles Rules governing the enlistment and rec







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top