PRAFULLA C.PANT, T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH
Pranab Kumar Deb – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Judgment
Prafulla C. Pant, CJ.:-By means of this writ petition, the writ petitioners have challenged vires of entry IV of class n heirs mentioned in the Schedule of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. It is further prayed that terms "deceased brother's son", "deceased brother's daughter", "deceased sister s son" and "deceased sister daughter" be taken to have been included in the entry H of class n of Schedule of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners and respondent No. 4 are related by following pedigree :-
Dr. Pulin Behari Deb (Died 11.4.1944).
Sushma Prabodh Subodh Sudhir Sukumari
(Daughter) Died in 1996 (Son) (Son) (Son) Died in 1986 (Died in 1984 Died in 2008 (Daughter Died in 200
XXX XXX XXX
3. As such, petitioners are nephews of respondent No. 4. Shyamal. Late Dr. Pulin Behari Deb who was ancestor of the petitioners and respondent No. 4 was a medical practitioner who left his properties after his death in Shillong. It is alleged by the petitioners that respondent No. 4 removed certain furnitures and articles from the rooms occupied by Subodh Chandra Deb (deceased) on which the petitioners served a notice da
(1997) 2 SCC 453 State of Bihar Vs. Bihar Distillery Ltd. (Para 14)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.