UMA NATH SINGH
Kailash Varma – Appellant
Versus
Dushyant Varma – Respondent
Judgment
Uma Nath Singh; Actg; CJ1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the proceedings.
2. Amongst the proceedings recorded in the past in CR(P) No. 56/2013, CR(P) No. 59/2013 and CR(P) No. 20/2014, by different benches of this Court, are the following orders which may give a brief background of the case leading to passing of the instant order. The first detailed order of that kind passed by a learned Single Judge dated 13-12-2013 is as:
"BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN CRP NO. 59 OF 2013
13.12.2013
Heard Mr. K Paul, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. HS Thangkhiew, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Mozika, the learned counsel for the respondent. Issue notice to the respondents.
Since Mr. HS Thangkhiew, the learned senior counsel is present and accepted notice, no formal notice is called for.
From the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that both the parties are filing petitions after petitions before different Courts including the Court of Munsiff in spite of the fact that a revision petition is pending before this Court as well as appeal pending before the Addl. Deputy Commissioner.
Considering the facts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.