SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Megh) 213

UMA NATH SINGH
Kailash Varma – Appellant
Versus
Dushyant Varma – Respondent


Judgment

Uma Nath Singh; Actg; CJ

1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the proceedings.

2. Amongst the proceedings recorded in the past in CR(P) No. 56/2013, CR(P) No. 59/2013 and CR(P) No. 20/2014, by different benches of this Court, are the following orders which may give a brief background of the case leading to passing of the instant order. The first detailed order of that kind passed by a learned Single Judge dated 13-12-2013 is as:

"BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN CRP NO. 59 OF 2013

13.12.2013

Heard Mr. K Paul, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. HS Thangkhiew, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Mozika, the learned counsel for the respondent. Issue notice to the respondents.

Since Mr. HS Thangkhiew, the learned senior counsel is present and accepted notice, no formal notice is called for.

From the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that both the parties are filing petitions after petitions before different Courts including the Court of Munsiff in spite of the fact that a revision petition is pending before this Court as well as appeal pending before the Addl. Deputy Commissioner.

Considering the facts













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top