2013 Supreme(Megh) 7
MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT
T. Nandakumar Singh, J.
Angela Rangad - Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 254 (SH) of 2012
Decided On : 27-05-2013
For the Appellant :H.S. Thangkhiew, Sr. Advocate and N. Mozika, Advocate
For the Respondents:S.P. Mahanta, A.A.G., S. Sen Gupta, G.A. and R. Gurung, Advocate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for impartiality and absence of bias in the appointment process, as any likelihood of bias can vitiate the appointment.
Headnote:
Bias - Appointment of Mission Director - [National Mission for Empowerment of Women, State Resource Centre for Women] - [No. 4-2/2010-WW, D.O. letter dated 05.04.2010, D.O. letter dated 22.04.2010, D.O. letter dated 25.05.2010, letter dated 16.12.2011, letter dated 17.02.2012, letter dated 07.03.2012, advertisement dated 18.05.2012] - The court found that the appointment of the Mission Director was biased and mala fide, as the respondent No. 6, the Director of Social Welfare Department, had actively participated in appointing the respondent No. 8, showing a likelihood of bias. The court quashed the impugned order dated 28.08.2012.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the appointment of the respondent No. 8 as Mission Director under the State Resource Centre for Women, alleging bias and mala fide in the appointment process.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment process was biased and mala fide, as the respondent No. 6 showed a likelihood of bias in appointing the respondent No. 8.
Issues: The main issue was the alleged bias and mala fide in the appointment process of the Mission Director.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appointment process was vitiated by bias, as the respondent No. 6 showed a likelihood of bias in appointing the respondent No. 8.
Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned order dated 28.08.2012, thereby invalidating the appointment of the Mission Director.
Judgment
T. Nandakumar Singh, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 28.08.2012 for appointing the respondent No. 8 Smti. Loma Nora Jyrwa as Mission Director under the State Resource Centre for Women on contract basis for initially a period of one year w.e.f. from the date of her joining, for that, one of the Members of the Departmental Selection Committee, on the recommendation of it, the respondent No. 8 had been appointed as Mission Director, more particularly, the Director of Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Meghalaya is mala fide and biased. Heard Mr. HS Thangkhiew, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Mozika, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.P. Mahanta, learned Addl. Advocate General, Meghalaya assisted by Mr. S. Sen Gupta, learned counsel for the State respondents. Also heard Mr. R. Gurung, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8.
2. Factual backgrounds:-On 08.03.2010, the Govt. of India launched the National Mission for Empowerment of Women for the purpose of empowerment of women socially and educationally. At the National level, the Mission has a National Mission Authority under the Chairmanship of the Prime Minister and is assisted by the Mission Directorate and the National Resource Centre for Women. At the State level, the Mission envisages setting up of State Mission Authority under the Chairmanship of the Chief Minister who will be provided the requisite support by the State Resource Centre for Women. The Govt. of India under the letter of the Secretary, Ministry of Women and Child Development Department, Govt. of India being letter No. D.O. No. 4-2/2010-WW dated 05.04.2010 informed the State Govt. about the Mission and also requested for initiation of the process for notifying the State Mission Authority at the earliest. The Ministry of Women & Child Development Department, Govt. of India, vide D.O. letter dated 22.04.2010 and the D.O. letter dated 25.05.2010, requested the State Govt. to constitute a State Resource Centre for Women (for short "SRCW") for operationalising the National Mission for Empowerment of Women. The Central Govt also prescribed the constitution of State Resource Centre for Women which is to comprise of a Project Advisor and a State Co-ordinator and other support staff. The Central Govt. laid down the qualifications, skills and experience etc. for selection of candidates for appointment to the said posts of Project Advisor and State Co-ordinator in the SRCW. This case is concerned with the post of Project Advisor and the qualifications and experience etc. for selection of the candidate for appointment to the post of Project Advisor are:-
3. The maximum age limit for the candidates for the post of Project Advisor is 50 years and the qualifications are Master's Degree in Social Work/Economics/Women's Studies/Law/Governance/and any other related field. Ph.D. in relevant field is desirable. Pursuant to the said letters of the Govt. of India, the respondent No. 5, the Deputy Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong, under his letter dated 09.12.2011, informed the respondent No. 2, the Union of India about the approval of the Govt. of Meghalaya for setting up of SRCW, but for the reasons best known to the respondents, the respondent No. 5 under the said letter dated 09.12.2011, had informed the Central Govt. that for the State Resource Centre for Women i.e. SCRW, it should have a Mission Director in place of the Project Advisor with the same consolidated fees of Rs. 50,000/- pm as applicable to the post of Project Advisor.
4. The Project Advisor is to head the SRCW under the State Centre Mission i.e. National Commission for Women Empowerment at the State level and as such, the Project Advisor is the most important and essential concomitant of the Mission at the State level. In response to the said letter of the respondent No. 5, the Executive Director, National Mission for Empowerment of Women and National Resource Centre