S.R.SEN
Iumingstar Nongsiej – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya, Represented by its Secretary & Commissioner (Home), Shillong, Meghalaya – Respondent
The petitioner’s case in a nutshell is that:
“The Meghalaya State Commission for Women i.e. the Respondent No. 3 following a prayer for maintenance by the Petitioner’s wife i.e. the Respondent No. 4 summoned the Petitioner for personal appearance on 23.03.2012 and on his appearance he was made to sign a pre-typed Agreement and thereafter the Commission vide letter dated 26.07.2012 directed the Respondent No. 2 to deduct an amount of Rs. 10, 000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) only from his salary and the Respondent No. 2, without application of mind, vide impugned Order dated 19.07.2012 started deducting Rs. 10, 000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) only per month from the salary of the Petitioner and the Petitioner being aggrieved vide his Representation dated 9.9.2012 and 15.4.2014 requested the Respondent No. 2 to revoke the impugned Order dated 19.7.2013 but the Respondent No. 2 vide his letter dated 30.4.2013 refused to do stating that the same can only be done on receipt of the settlement agreement with the Meghalaya State Commission for Women or on the orders of the appropriate court having jurisdiction over the powers and functions of the State Commission for Women.
Hence, this Petition”.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.