SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Megh) 61

UMA NATH SINGH, S.R.SEN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Satya Narayan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants: Mr. R. Deb Nath, C.G.C.

ORDER

1. Mr R Deb Nath, learned CGC, appears for the appellant.

No one appears for the respondent.

We have heard learned counsel for appellants and perused the pleadings of writ appeal.

2. This writ appeal has been filed against judgment and order dated 22.4.2014, passed by learned single Judge in WP(C) No.214 of 2013, whereby, the writ petition was allowed while holding that since injury suffered by respondent (writ petitioner) was attributable to service he is entitled to get disability pension under the Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules. It was also directed to pay the disability pension to the respondent (writ petitioner) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.

3. The fact of the case is that the respondent (herein), TC No.68775 (G/5000649) Ex Rct/GD Satyanarayan was enrolled in Assam Rifles on 12th March 2004. He was informed at the time of his enrolment into Assam Rifles, by the Presiding Officer of the Recruitment team that in case he is found unfit to become an efficient soldier during course of traini

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top