Back
S.R.SEN
Seng Khasi Mylliem – Appellant
Versus
Midnightborn Kharlukhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.R. Sen, J.
Heard Mr. H.S. Thangkhiew, learned Sr. counsel and Mr. T.T. Diengdoh, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. A. Thangkhiew, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Sunar, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents.
Both the petitioner as well as the respondents are present before the Court today.
2. The petitioner's case in a nutshell is that:
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
