SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Megh) 28

H.S.THANGKHIEW
Abhay Tewatia – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D.S. Kauntae, Adv.
For the Respondents: K. Paul, CGC

JUDGMENT :

H.S. Thangkhiew, J.

1. The brief facts of the case is that an advertisement was published on 05.10.2012 by the respondents for 328 vacancies for the posts of 'Havildar Clerk'. The petitioner herein had applied for the same and was found to be qualified, but no appointment was afforded to him on the ground that he was found low in the merit list prepared state wise. The petitioner challenged this decision before the Punjab and Haryana High Court which was however, dismissed on the grounds of territorial jurisdiction as the entire recruitment process had taken place in Jorhat, Dimapur and Shillong. As such, this instant writ petition is before this Court.

2. Mr. D.S. Kauntae, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner on having been found qualified after the selection process was expecting his appointment letter but the name of the petitioner was not found in the list of the 156 selected candidates issued by the respondents. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner on his name not appearing in the merit list, sent a legal notice in the f

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top