HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
W. Diengdoh, J.
Danme N. Sangma - Appellant
Versus
Pinthu N. Marak - Respondent
Crl. Petn. No. 17 of 2022
Decided On : 16-08-2022
Maintenance - Registration of Interim Maintenance Petition - The court directed the registration of the petitioner's application for grant of interim maintenance and ordered the parties to be heard before any order is passed, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner and the respondent were residing together as husband and wife as per Garo Customary Law and had a child. The respondent left the matrimonial home to join duty and stopped communicating with the petitioner, who filed for maintenance.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the registration of the petitioner's application for grant of interim maintenance and ordered the parties to be heard before any order is passed, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Issues: Registration of Interim Maintenance Petition
Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to direct the registration of the petitioner's application for grant of interim maintenance and ordered the parties to be heard before any order is passed.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition, directing the registration of the petitioner's application for grant of interim maintenance and ordering the parties to be heard before any order is passed. No costs were awarded.
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. A. G. Momin, learned counsel for the petitioner who has submitted that the petitioner and the respondent were residing together as husband and wife as per Garo Customary Law since 07.07.2012, out of which union they were blessed with a baby girl who was born on 03.08.2013.
2. The respondent who is working in the Police Department, on 10.09.2014 left the matrimonial home to join duty at Williamnagar under the Commandant, 5th MLP Battalion, Williamnagar and since then, has stopped communicating with the petitioner and has also failed to maintain the family. The petitioner in the month of October 2014 went to Williamnagar to visit the respondent but was shocked and surprised to find that the respondent was living with another woman. Even with the intervention of the relatives to reconcile the petitioner and the respondent, the respondent has decided not to stay together with the petitioner.
3. The petitioner was thereafter compelled to file an application under Section 125 CrPC for maintenance which petition was registered as Misc. Case No. 14 of 2014 before the Subordinate Court, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura. Along with the said petition, an application for grant of interim maintenance was also preferred before the same court being registered as Misc. Case No. 14(A) of 2014.
4. The learned counsel has further submitted that the case of the petitioner before the court of the concerned Magistrate was conducted by a counsel who has soon after disengaged himself as counsel, upon which the present counsel was empowered and engaged by the petitioner to take up the matter before the Court. The new counsel was under the impression that the said Misc. Case for interim maintenance was not proceeded before the Court and has accordingly approached this Court by way of Crl. Petn. No. 6 of 2021 upon which this court vide order dated 18.02.2021 has directed the learned court of the Magistrate to take up the said case for interim maintenance.
5. However, on her appearance before the said court of the Magistrate at Tura, the petitioner was directed to an order dated 12.07.2016 whereby the learned Magistrate by a related order has rejected the prayer for grant of interim maintenance on the grounds stated therein.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has then approached this Court against the said order dated 12.07.2016 but has subsequently withdrawn the same. However, a fresh application for grant of interim maintenance was filed before the Court of the learned Judicial Office Assistant Judge, District and Sessions, District Council Court, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner has finally submitted that when the petitioner approached the office of the District and Sessions, District Council Court, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura for registration of the said petition for grant of interim maintenance, the same was refused to be registered. Hence this case.
8. In the meantime, on the prayer of the petitioner this Court has called for the report from the learned Assistant Judge, District and Sessions, District Council Court, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura as to why the said petition was refused to be registered, the report received vide Communication No. GDC-JD/LD/(B) 2010/7/273/442 dated 08.08.2022 has not indicated a clear answer to the query made, but has only referred to the previous proceedings wherein the earlier application for grant of interim maintenance was disposed of.
9. On consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the first instant, this Court is constraint to direct the office of the Court of the Assistant Judge, District and Sessions, District Council Court, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura to register the application of the petitioner for grant of interim maintenance and upon hearing the parties, may pass necessary orders in accordance with
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to direct the registration of an application for grant of interim maintenance.
Point of Law : Even if the right to claim maintenance was voluntarily waived by the wife, that itself is not a bar by the wife, seeking maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, if she is unable to maintai....
The purpose of maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C is to prevent destitution and vagrancy, and the entitlement to maintenance is not solely based on the actions of the parties involved.
Cohabitation as 'husband and wife' requires proof for maintenance claims under Section 125, CrPC, and lack of evidence invalidates interim maintenance awards.
The duty of a husband to maintain his wife under Section 125 of the CrPC prevails, and willingness to take back the wife should be proven through legal procedures.
The court confirms authority to award interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC based on evidence of marital status, asserting duty to support the dependent parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.