W. DIENGDOH
Md. Munna – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These two writ petitions filed separately were taken up and heard together since the issues and questions involved are common, inasmuch as, it relates to similar and almost identical impugned orders wherein, the respondent taking recourse to the provision of Clause 56 (j) of the Fundamental Rules and Rule 48 (1) (b) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 had caused retirement of the petitioners herein on their completion of thirty years of qualifying service. Accordingly, it is deemed expedient and convenient for these matters to be taken up together and a common order to be passed thereto.
2. The petitioner in WP(C) No. 64 of 2015, Md. Munna was serving as Naib Subedar Clerk at Headquarter 5 Sector Assam Rifles at the relevant period when he was served with an order dated 18.02.2015 (Annexure-5) passed by the respondent No. 2 by virtue of exercise of power conferred by Clause 56 (j) of the Fundamental Rules and Rule 48 (1) (b) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, wherein he was given notice that on completion of thirty years of qualifying service for pension, he shall retire from service on the forenoon of 1st September, 2015.
3. Being aggrieved by the said orde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.