L.K.MOHAPATRA, N.KOTISWAR SINGH
Wahengbam Ongbi Usharani – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
L.K. Mohapatra, ACJ.:-
The petitioner is the wife of the detenu, Wahengbam Ramananda Singh. She has filed this writ application challenging the order passed by the District Magistrate, Imphal East dated 08.01.2014 directing the detention of the husband of the petitioner under Sub Section 3 of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980(for short ‘NSA’).
2. From the grounds of detention, it appears that the husband of the petitioner joined a banned organization namely United National Liberation Front (UNLF in short) in Sept.1994 and started working for the said organization. He was arrested once in 1996 and had been released on bail. Subsequently, on three more occasions, i.e. once in 1997, once in 1999 and once in 2012, he had been arrested and released on bail. On 4.12.2013 he was arrested for the 5th time and two Mobile Handsets with Sim cards had been seized from his possession. He was handed over to the local police and FIR No.91(12)13 HNG P.S. was registered for commission of offence u/s 365/447/120-B IPC read with Section 25(1-C) Arms Act and was remanded to police custody upto 18.12.2013. On 18.12.2013 when he was produced before the Court for judicial remand, he was
Huidrom Konungjao Vs. State of Manipur : (2012) 7 SCC 181 [Para 3]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.