Back
SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO
Keisham Rojenkumar Singh, S/o Late K. Birchandra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur represented by the Secretary/Commissioner, Law & Legislative Affairs Department, Government of Manipur – Respondent
Heard Mr. N. Mahendra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Athouba Khaidem, learned G.A. appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Kh. Shanta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2.
2. This writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India was registered on the application filed by the petitioners who are members of the same family, praying for quashing the complaint case No. 22 of 2013 pending before the Manipur State Commission for Women at Lamphelpat which was instituted on a petition submitted by respondent No. 3 in this case, on the ground that the Commission has no jurisdiction to entertain the same.
Facts and circumstances leading to the filing of this writ petition as submitted by the petitioners:
3. The respondent No. 3 claiming to have been married to the petitioner No. 3 on 11.01.2013 following their elopement on 10.01.2013 filed a complaint petition on 06.03.2013 before the Chairperson, Manipur State Commission for Women, Lamphelpat, Imphal alleging that from the very night of their marriage itself she was harshly ill-treated by the 2 (two) aunts of the petitioner No. 3, and on the following day also, the petitioner
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
