1. Heard Mr. T. Rajendra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Th. Ibohal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. A. Peter, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and Ms. Ch. Sundari, learned G.A. appearing for the respondent No. 3.

2. The petitioners in this case have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for setting aside the impugned order dated 18.03.2015 passed by the learned Revenue Tribunal, Manipur in Revenue Revision Case No. 101 of 2014, wherein they were objectors/respondents No. 3 and 4. The brief facts and circumstances which led the petitioners to file the present petition are as follows:

The principal respondent, in this case, submitted an application before the Sub-Deputy Collector (SDC), Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur praying for mutation of her name in the record of rights of the homestead land under Patta No. 165 covered by C.S. Dag No. 319 (which shall hereafter be referred to as the suit land) claiming that she had inherited the same from her late husb