IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
R. SUDHAKAR, KH. NOBIN SINGH, JJ.
R.K. PREMJIT SING - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MANIPUR - Respondent
PIL No. 16 of 2017.
Decided on : 31-05-2018
Misappropriation - Public Interest Litigation - MGNREG Scheme - [MGNREG Act, Section 4(1)(a), Section 6(1)] - The court discussed the gross misused of funds allocated for implementing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (MNRGES) scheme. It highlighted the misappropriation of funds, failure to provide employment to job card holders, and the need for proper implementation of the scheme. The court directed the Commissioner/Secretary (RD & PR), Govt. of Manipur to call for a report from every District Collectors on the proper implementation of the scheme and take appropriate action wherever the officials failed to execute the scheme in letter and spirit. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Manipur was directed to hold a meeting with the Secretary/Commissioner of the Department concerned and all the District Collectors to ensure proper implementation of the scheme and to proceed with officials found to have misappropriated funds as per law.
Fact of the Case:
The Public Interest Litigation focused on the misused of funds allocated for implementing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (MNRGES) scheme, alleging large scale misappropriation of funds by the Implementing Agency.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was gross misused of funds allocated for implementing the MNRGES scheme and directed the authorities to ensure proper implementation of the scheme and take appropriate action against officials found to have misappropriated funds.
Issues: Misappropriation of funds, failure to provide employment to job card holders, and proper implementation of the MNRGES scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for proper implementation of the MNRGES scheme and directed the authorities to take action against officials responsible for misappropriation of funds.
Final Decision: The PIL was disposed of with directions to ensure proper implementation of the MNRGES scheme and to take action against officials found to have misappropriated funds.
R. SUDHAKAR, J.
1. The prayer in the PIL read as follows:
i. Call for the records of the case and issue rule nisi calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the prayer prayed for by the Petitioner should not be granted. And, after hearing them your Lordships may make the rule absolute;
ii. Issue a writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ/order/direction directing the Respondents to (a) put an end to the misuse, misappropriation and mismanagement of funds sanctioned for the benefit of the job card holders under the MGNREG scheme, (b) provide at least 100 (hundred) days of employment to those who seek employment, (c) pay Unemployment Allowances to those who cannot be provided employment, (d) pay the wages of those who put in a number of days of work, and (e) utilize the scarce public resources for the benefit of the poor job card holders;
iii. Issue any appropriate writ/order/direction directing the Respondents to fix responsibility for the illegal and irregular practice of misappropriation of public money and punish them as per law;
iv. Issue any appropriate writ/order/direction for the constitution of a CBI enquiry, judicial enquiry or any other appropriate Commission, as the Hon'ble Court thinks fit, to enquire into the rampant and large scale misappropriation of public money;
v. Pass any other appropriate order/direction that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and just in the interest of justice.
vi. Award cost of the Petition to the Petitioner."
2. Similar issue was considered by this Court in PIL No.5 of 2012 and decided on 22.05.2018 in the following manner.
3. The Public Interest Litigation focuses on gross misused of the funds allocated for implementing the scheme by Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (MNRGES). This scheme was introduced with an object of providing daily employment to the people living in the rural and far flung hilly areas so that they sustain themselves and the family on manual labour.
4. Over the period of time, it appears that the scheme has been severely breached and misused. The object of providing employment has become a source of competition. Time and again people all over the country have been approaching the Courts and authorities to ensure that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme is implemented properly and not misused for private benefits of vested interested groups. The poor labourers of the rural and hilly areas have been scare goats for unlawful enrichment by authorities.
It is alleged that there is large scale misappropriation of fund by the Implementing Agency. Record are prepared to show the people have been benefited under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme, for rural development works like laying of roads, canal, reclamation of land and other scheme works for benefit of all the populace of the villages. Instead of achieving this object, it appears that crores of money has been siphoned off by the vested interests with the connivance of the officials. That is the main allegations in the Public Interest Litigation. Details are submitted in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. The petitioner have been moving various authorities to highlight the misappropriation of funds by making complaints/FIRs, some of which has initiation of the investigation. Number of violations that had been pointed out at para no.21 of the writ petition, which relates to different type of works, is reproduced hereinbelow:
"21. That it is further submitted that huge amount of money in the name of implementation of works under the MGNREGS has been misappropriated by the authorities concerned in the State of Manipur without executing any work. The particulars of the works/projects are as follows:
(A) (a) That it is submitted that during the year 2010, a project called the Land Development at Liberal College, Luwangsangbam was approved by the Deputy Commissioner/District Programme Co-ordinator, NREGS, Imphal East Dis
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.