RAKESH RANJAN PRASAD
Moirangthem Hemanta Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ningthoujam Biren Singh – Respondent
Rakesh Ranjan, J.
Heard Mr. N. Surendrajit, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. H. Iswarlal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent complainant.
2. This criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is directed against the order dated 23.2.2015 passed in Cril (C) Case No.35 of 2015 whereby and where-under the Incharge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Imphal West, took cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after recording that prima facie case is made out under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.
3. That order dated 23.2.2015 is under challenge.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner submits that whatever transaction took place, it took place in between the complainant and Mr. M. Biren Singh the younger brother of the petitioner and thereby the amount was given through Cheque by the complainant to the said M. Biren Singh. However, it has also been alleged that the petitioner, in discharge of the said debt had given the Cheque of Rs.12 to the complainant which got dishonoured when it was deposited by the complainant. But the fact remains that transaction had taken place in betw
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.