R.SUDHAKAR, KH.NOBIN SINGH
Th. Pika Singh – Appellant
Versus
L. Paulungmuan – Respondent
ORDER :
Kh. Nobin Singh, J.
1. Heard Shri N. Jotendro, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. M.C. Linthoingambee, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant; Shri Lenin Hijam, learned Addl. Advocate General for the respondent No. 2 and Shri Y. Nirmolchand, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri U. Augusta, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 1.
2. The instant writ appeal is directed against the interim order dated 20-01-2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court by which the Government order dated 04-01-2020 allowing the appellant/private respondent to hold the post of Executive Engineer, Water Supply Maintenance Division No. 1, PHED, Manipur (hereinafter referred to as the "the PHED") on in-charge basis, has been directed to remain suspended.
3. The respondent/writ petitioner was appointed on promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer, PHED, Government of Manipur vide order dated 23-02-2018 and his name is reflected at Sl. No. 40 of the combined seniority list of the Assistant Engineers/Assistant Surveyor of Works/Engineer Assistants in PHED, Manipur published vide Notification dated 18-11-2019.
4. On 02-01-2020, the Joint Secretary (PHED), Government of
Narsingh Prasad Vs. Anil Kumar Jain & ors.
Government of Andhra Pradesh & anr. Vs. A.V. Venugopala Rao
Mangsatabam Imomacha Singh Vs. State of Manipur reported in 2012 (4) GauLT 808
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.