SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Manipur) 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Sanjay Kumar, M.V. Muralidaran, JJ.
Gainaichung Malangmei - Appellant
Versus
State Of Manipur & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 12 of 2020 and MC(WA) No. 73 of 2022
Decided On : 29-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Serto T.Kom, Advocate, for the Appellant/Applicant; Mr. S.Nepolean, Govt. Advocate, Mr. Julius Riamei, Advocate, for the Respondents

Headnote:

Khullakpa - Indigenous Naga Community - Manipur (Village Authorities in Hill Areas) Act, 1956, Section 3(4) - The judgment discusses the recognition and election of the Khullakpa (Chief) and the Chairman of the Village Authority of Pongringlong Village, highlighting the customary norms and traditions governing the post of Khullakpa and the legal provisions under the Act of 1956. The court clarifies the distinction between the posts of Khullakpa and Chairman of the Village Authority and emphasizes the need for a competent Civil Court to determine the status of the Khullakpa.

Fact of the Case:

The case involves a dispute over the recognition and election of the Khullakpa and Chairman of the Village Authority of Pongringlong Village, an indigenous Naga community in Manipur. The appellant, Gainaichung Malangmei, claimed to be the Khullakpa and Chairman, while the respondent, Ningtoulung Daimei, was declared elected as the Khullakpa/Chief of the Village Authority by the authorities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the post of Khullakpa is governed by customary norms and traditions and is not necessarily hereditary. It noted the history of disputes and the removal of Gainaichung Malangmei from the post by the village elders. The court clarified the distinction between the posts of Khullakpa and Chairman of the Village Authority and directed those claiming the post of Khullakpa to approach the competent Civil Court for a declaration of their status.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the recognition and election of the Khullakpa and Chairman of the Village Authority of Pongringlong Village, the applicability of customary norms and traditions, and the interpretation of the Act of 1956.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the post of Khullakpa is governed by customary norms and traditions and clarified the distinction between the posts of Khullakpa and Chairman of the Village Authority. It emphasized the need for a competent Civil Court to determine the status of the Khullakpa.

Final Decision: The court modified the order declaring Ningtoulung Daimei as the Khullakpa/Chief, reading it down to mean that he was elected only to the post of Ex-Officio Chairman of the Village Authority. It granted liberty to those claiming the post of Khullakpa to approach the competent forum for a declaration of their status.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar; CJ. - Preceded by a long and checkered history, ancient as well as litigative, factual narrative in these cases needs recount at length and in detail.

2. The 'Zeliangrong' are one of the indigenous Naga communities in Manipur. 'Zeliangrong' comprises Zeme, Liangmei and Rongmei (Kabui) Tribes combined. It is derived from 'Ze' from Zeme, 'Liang' from Liangmei and 'Rong' from Rongmei. In these indigenous tribes, the posts of 'Khunbu' and 'Khullakpa' were in vogue since times immemorial. 'Khunbu' refers to the founder/owner of the village whereas 'Khullakpa' is the Headman or administrator of the village. The post of 'Khullakpa' is sacrosanct as he is the representative of the village in all religious rites, apart from being its administrator. The office of 'Khullakpa' is not considered hereditary in the sense of a son automatically succeeding his father, though a son or a younger brother stands a good chance of assuming office after the death of the incumbent. The usual tradition is that the vacancy in this office would be filled up with the senior-most serving male of the clan to which the deceased belonged and, generally, he who is selected as 'Khullakpa' holds office for life (See Mangthoi Thaimei's; 'An Introduction to Tribal Language and Culture of Manipur', First Published in 1976, at pages 45-48). The 'Khullakpa' is held in great respect but he does not possess absolute powers, akin to a Kuki Chief. The village elders cannot be over-ridden by the 'Khullakpa'. The body of 'village elders' is known as 'Thoubei/Pei' and it is assisted by the 'Khullakpa'. 'Khullakpa' has now received legal recognition in the Manipur (Village Authorities in Hill Areas) Act, 1956, (for brevity, 'the Act of 1956'). Section 3 of the Act of 1956 deals with the constitution of Village Authorities in the hill areas of Manipur. Each such Village Authority is to be headed by an 'Ex-Officio Chairman'. Section 3(4) of the Act of 1956 states that, where there is a Chief or 'Khullakpa' in a village, he shall be the 'Ex-Officio Chairman' of the Village Authority of that village and it is only when there is no such Chief or 'Khullakpa' in the village that the Chairman of that Village Authority should be elected by the members of the Village Authority from amongst themselves.

3. Charoipandongba Village in Senapati District (presently, in Kangpokpi District), is a Zeliangrong Naga Village. The name of the village was changed to Pongringlong, vide order dated 28.10.2003 of the Commissioner (Hills), Government of Manipur. The three founding clans in this village were Daimei, Malangmei/Khandangmei and Panmei. The Village Council (Thoubei/Pei) was the apex administrative body, comprising village elders. In so far as this village is concerned, the post of Khullakpa was not treated as a hereditary post, passing from father to son, but was given to the eldest member of one of the three clans. At times, it seems that there was no Khullakpa at all. This is borne out by the fact that its Village Authority was headed by a Khullakpa during certain periods of time and, at others, there was an 'elected' Chairman. Forms of the Returning Officer (Rule-13) dated 14.05.1998 and 02.09.2002, signed by the Election Officer, reflect that Lanlimlung Panmei was elected as the Chairman of the Village Authority of Charoipandongba Village unanimously. Similarly, the Form of the Returning Officer (Rule-13) dated 26.11.2007 reflects that Lungaingam Gonmei was elected unanimously as the Chairman of the Village Authority for Charoipandongba (Pongringlong) Village at that time.

4. It is in this context that the present litigation arises. Gainaichung Malangmei, the appellant/ applicant, claims to be the Khullakpa of Pongringlong Village and, by default, the Chairman of its Village Authority but, Ningtoulung Daimei, respondent No.4 in the appeal, was declared elected as the Khullakpa/Chief of its Village Authority by the Additional Chief Secretary (TA & Hills), Government of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top