IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
Mr. M. Nchumbemo Kikon S/o Lt. Mensemo Kikon And Ors – Appellants
Versus
The State Of Nagaland And Ors – Respondents
WP(C) 286 of 2021
Decided on : 07-02-2024
Nagaland Village and Tribal Councils Act - Selection of Village Council Member - Section 4 of the Nagaland Village and Tribal Councils Act, 1978 - [Kikon Clan Selection] - [Section 4] - The court set aside the selection of respondent No. 7 as the village council member representing the Kikon clan in Nungying Village, as it was done without consultation with other clan members and not in accordance with prevailing customary practices and usages.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition challenged the selection of respondent No. 7 as Village Council Member (VCM) to represent the Kikon clan of Nungying Village, alleging that the selection was done without consent or consultation with the clan members.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the selection of respondent No. 7 as VCM was not in accordance with the prevailing customary practices and usages, and was done without consultation with other clan members. The speaking order rejecting the representation of the petitioners was set aside, and the selection of respondent No. 7 as VCM was also set aside.
Issues: The main issue was whether the selection of respondent No. 7 as VCM representing the Kikon clan was done in accordance with the prevailing customary practices and usages, and with consultation with other clan members.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the selection of VCM should be in accordance with Section 4 of the Nagaland Village and Tribal Councils Act, 1978, which requires the members of the village council to be chosen by the villagers in accordance with prevailing customary practices and usages. The court also emphasized the need for consultation with the whole clan before nominating a VCM.
Final Decision: The court set aside the speaking order rejecting the representation of the petitioners and the selection of respondent No. 7 as VCM. The State respondents were directed to re-notify the process of election to the post of VCM representing the Kikon clan, to be conducted under the supervision of the Deputy Commissioner, Wokha or his nominated officer, within three months.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. N. Mozhui, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. Angami, learned Senior Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Mr. Z. Nlumsao Ngullie, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by 33 nos. of petitioners who are the Clan Members of the Kikon clan of Nungying Village impugning the selection of respondent No. 7 as Village Council Member to represent the Kikon clan of Nungying Village on the ground that the selection of respondent No. 7 as VCM was done by respondent No. 6 in his personal capacity without any consent or consultation with the members of Kikon clan of Nungying Village.
3. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant writ petition, in brief, are as follows:-
(ii) It was further directed that the whole process of the selection/election of the Village Council Members should be completed on or before 25th March 2021 and the list of New Village Councils Members may be submitted to the SDO (Civil) Sadar.
(iii) As per the Government notifications mentioned hereinabove to select/elect the new Village Council Member for the tenure 2021-26 as per the prevailing customary practices and usages, Humtsoruiden of Kikon clan deliberated over the matters of representation of its clan members to the post of Village Council Member and accordingly unanimously selected/elected Mr. Mhabemo Kikon (Petitioner No.5) and thereafter, Mr. Mosen Kikon, who is the Secretary of the clan wrote to respondent No. 4 i.e., the Extra Assistant Commissioner, Chukitong, Wokha district regarding selection/election of petitioner No. 5 to represent the Kikon clan as Village Council Member of Nungying Village.
(iv) In the meanwhile, the respondent No. 6 Mr. Tsumomo Kikon without the consent of the other clan members, submitted the name of Mr. Nchumomo Kikon, respondent No. 7 as the clan representative to be the Village Council Member of Nungying Village to the Head G.B.
(v) It is stated that the name of respondent No. 7 was forwarded by respondent No. 6 to the government without the consent of the other members of the petitioners’ clan.
(vi) After coming to know about the fact of respondent No. 6 nominating the name of respondent No. 7, the members of petitioners clan deliberated on the issue and by a resolution adopted in the meeting dated 30.03.2021 adopted a resolution that the respondent No. 6 has nominated the name of respondent No. 7 to be the Village Council Member without the consent and consultation of Humtsoruiden of Kikon clan and accordingly wrote a letter to Extra Assistant Commissioner (EAC), Chukitong appraising about the decision of the clan against the selection of respondent No. 7 without the consent of Humtsoruiden of Kikon clan and reiterated the decision of the clan to nominate petitioner No.5 as VCM for the tenure 2021 – 2026.
(vii) The respondent No. 4 after receipt of complaint from the present petitioners endorse the matters to the Dobashi to verify the complaint and to submit a report and accordingly the Dobashi submitted a re
The main legal point established is that the selection of Village Council Members must be in accordance with prevailing customary practices and usages, and should involve consultation with the whole ....
The statutory mandate of Section 20 of the Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978 should not be overlooked in disputes over the selection of Village Council Members.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the replacement of a selected Village Council Member must be based on statutory grounds and due process, as provided in the Nagaland Village C....
When a statutory functionary makes an order based on certain grounds, its validity must be judged by the reasons so mentioned and cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons in the shape of affidavit or ....
The selection of Village Council Members must comply with customary practices and the Nagaland Village Councils Act, ensuring fair representation of all clans regardless of household numbers.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Village Council to choose a Chairman as per Section 7(1) of the Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978, and the impact of the ....
The Court established that removal from office must be preceded by a show cause notice and an opportunity to defend, aligning with principles of natural justice.
The judgment establishes the principle that village institutions, such as Village Councils, are amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It also emphasizes the li....
The Deputy Commissioner's decision regarding VDB member selection must be reasonable and based on evidence of majority support from clans.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.