MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
M. Nchumbemo Kikon S/o Lt. Mensemo Kikon – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. N. Mozhui, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. Angami, learned Senior Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Mr. Z. Nlumsao Ngullie, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by 33 nos. of petitioners who are the Clan Members of the Kikon clan of Nungying Village impugning the selection of respondent No. 7 as Village Council Member to represent the Kikon clan of Nungying Village on the ground that the selection of respondent No. 7 as VCM was done by respondent No. 6 in his personal capacity without any consent or consultation with the members of Kikon clan of Nungying Village.
3. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant writ petition, in brief, are as follows:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.