Back
M. V. MURALIDARAN
Thumlip Tiningpham Monsang – Appellant
Versus
Sharda Maibam – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This application has been filed by the applicant to vacate the ex parte interim order dated 18.1.2022 granted in W.P.(C) No.23 of 2022.
2. Heard N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, the learned senior counsel for the respondents 1 to 8/writ petitioners.
3. The applicant herein is the second respondent in the main writ petition.
4. The writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioners to quash the order dated 13.1.2022, whereby the Chairperson (in-charge) of the Manipur State Commission for Women ordered disengagement of the writ petitioners with immediate effect. When the writ petition was taken up for admission on 18.1.2022, this Court, while issuing notice to the respondents, granted an interim order directing the respondents not to give effect of the impugned order dated 13.1.2022 till the next date and adjourned the writ petitioner to 22.2.2022 and the said interim order still continues.
5. Assailing the impugned order dated 18.1.2022 granted by this Court, Mr. N. Jotendro, the learned senior counsel for the applicant submitted that the extension order dated 3.9.2021 thereby extending the services of the writ petitioners with e
The importance of natural justice, the requirement of notice before termination, and the entitlement of employees to continue in service pursuant to valid extension orders.
Point of Law : Court quashing an administrative decision without substituting its own decision, and is to be contrasted with an appeal where the appellate tribunal substitutes its own decision on the....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of natural justice, arbitrary actions by state authorities, and justified delay in approaching the court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation of the power of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to reach injustice wherever it is found an....
The court affirmed that previous employment claimed by a Swechhasevi Sikshya Sahayak was invalid due to prior judicial orders deeming the recruitment process null and void, thus rejecting claims for ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
