Back
AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) – Appellant
Versus
Mayanglambam (N) Naorem (O) Manimacha Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. W. Darakishwor, learned senior panel counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K. Pradip, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The present Criminal Revision Petitions have been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. with the prayer for quashing and setting aside the impugned Zima order dated 20.09.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, Imphal West in Cril. Misc. (Z) Case No. 7 of 2021 and Cril. Misc. (Z) Case No. 8 of 2021. As the present two revision petitions are connected and arose out of the FIR No. R.C. 0212020A0006 P.S./C.B.I (ACB), Imphal u/s 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (b) P.C. Act, 1988 (as amended), the same is being disposed of by this common order.
2. The facts of the present cases in a nutshell are that the petitioner (CBI) registered a case under FIR No. R.C. 0212020A0006 P.S./CBI (ACB), Imphal u/s 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (b) of the P.C. Act, 1988, (as amended) on 14.11.2020 against one Shri Naorem Budhichandra Singh, the respondent in Cril. Rev. Petn. No. 20 of 2021, for alleged possession of properties disproportionate to his known source of income. Thereafter, on 16.12.2020, the petitioner (CBI) conducted a search operation a
The procedure for attachment or seizure of property relating to offences under the P.C. Act is governed by the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944 and not Section 102 Cr.P.C.
The Prevention of Corruption Act being a complete code and a Special Act excludes the application of Section 102 Cr.P.C in the matter of attachment or seizure of property relating to offences committ....
The court affirmed that freezing bank accounts under Section 102 Cr.P.C. is valid, and failure to report the seizure does not invalidate the action, distinguishing between seizure and attachment unde....
The freezing of bank accounts under Section 102 Cr.P.C. is valid despite the existence of specific provisions in the Criminal Law Amendment Act, and failure to report the seizure does not invalidate ....
Seizure of bank accounts and bank locker under Section 102 Cr.P.C is lawful if they have direct links with the alleged offence, and the transfer of seized property from one case to another can be jus....
Taxation - De-freezing of accounts - Illegal gratification/kickbacks in bank account - Amount which does not relate to impugned transaction alongwith interest accrued thereon be directed to be releas....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
