SANJAY KUMAR
Akangjam Alias Kangjam Ningol Pramodini Devi – Appellant
Versus
Akangjam Naran Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Plaintiffs No. 2,3, 4(i), 4(ii), 4(iii), 4(iv), 5 and 6 in O.S. No. 9 of 2003 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Imphal West-II, are the petitioners in this revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. They are aggrieved by the dismissal of their application in Judl. Misc. Case No. 82 of 2018 (Ref: O.S. No. 9 of 2003), filed for producing additional documents and for recalling a witness on their behalf to adduce the same in evidence.
2. Order dated 11-12-2019 was passed in this revision, suspending further proceedings in O.S. No. 9 of 2003 before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Imphal West - II. The order is still in operation.
3. Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioners; Mr. R.K. Milan, learned counsel, appearing for respondents No. 1 to 7 & 9; and Mr. Winner S., learned counsel, representing Mr. S. Jasobanta, learned counsel for the LRs of respondent No. 8.
4. O.S. No. 9 of 2003 was filed by the petitioners herein and another for a permanent injunction; demarcation; eviction, etc. The plaintiffs' evidence in the suit was originally fixed on 26-09-2005 but it commenced only on 25-11-2010 and con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.