SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.SANTHANAM, P.K.AMMINI
N. Krishnan Navabharat Cashew Traders – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.K. Nair, V. Aiyappan,C. Abraham

ORDER

Per G. Santhanam, Accountant Member - The appeals are by the assessee and the revenue and the cross objection is by the assessee. As common issues are involved a consolidated order is, passed for the sake of convenience.

2. The assessee is mainly a cashew exporter, but had business in foreign liquor and toddy besides deriving share income from a few firms. The previous year is the financial year ending on 31-3-1981 relevant to the assessment year 1981-82. The return of income was filed on 3-11-1983 admitting a loss of Rs. 58,216 for the relevant previous year. The total loss returned in the return was at Rs. 11,53,920. As a result of the failure of the assessee to comply with the requirements of the notices issued by the Income-tax Officer, the assessment was completed ex parte under section 144 of the I.T. Act on 12-9-1984. The notice of demand along with the assessment order was served on the assessee's advocate. On the basis of a petition dated 15-9-1984 filed by the assessee's advocate, the ex parte assessment was cancelled under section 146 on 24-9-1984 and the fresh assessment was completed on 27-3-1987 making certain additions and disallowances as follows :

1.Incl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top