SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

U.B.S.BEDI, B.M.KOTHARI
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
O. N. G. C. As agent of Foramer France – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N. Bhargava,Kavesh Syal

ORDER

Per B.M. Kothari, Accountant Member - These two appeals by the Revenue are directed against a consolidated order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on 14-2-1990 for assessment years 1985-86 and 1986-87. The following common ground has been raised in these appeals :—

"That the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in law as well as on facts in holding that income was assessable under section 44BB and not as fees from technical services under section 44D of the Act."

2. M/s. Oil & Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) as Agent of M/s. Foramer, France (non resident) submitted return of income for assessment year 1985-86 on 28-2-1986 declaring total income of Rs. 8,34,750 and for assessment year 1986-87 on 1-12-1986 declaring total income of Rs. 12,66,980. The Assessing Officer observed that the non-resident company M/s. Foramer, France (FF) had entered into a contract with ONGC for supply of supervisory staff and personnel having expertise in operation and management of drilling rigs "Sagar Jyoti" and "Sagar Pragati" in assessment year 1985-86 and for operation and management of drilling rig "Sagar Ratna" in assessment year 1986-87. The Assessing Officer relying upon the findings give

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top