SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.M.JAGTAP, S.R.CHAUHAN
Wealth Tax Officer – Appellant
Versus
Durlabhlal Sewalal Yagnik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.M. Nagar,R.N. Jangid

ORDER

By the Bench.—As the above appeals and COs involve common points so we are disposing them of by this common order for the sake of convenience.

2. WTA Nos. 153/Jp./1994 to 159/Jp./1994 are appeals by the IT Department for the assessment years 1984-85 to 1990-91 respectively, against the common order of CWT(A), Udaipur, dated 11-2-1994, whereby he treated the reassessments made under section 16(3)/17, WT Act, to be void and accordingly allowed the assessee’s appeals for the aforesaid seven assessment years. Aggrieved by the same, the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal.

3. CO Nos. 27/Jd./1998 to 33/Jd./1998 are COs by the assessee for the assessment years 1984-85 to 1990-91 which are directed against the common order of CWT(A), Udaipur, dated 11-2-1994, inasmuch as the learned CWT(A) disposed of the appeals before her solely on the ground of invalidity of the assessments due to non-existence of HUF, and did not decide some other substantive grounds taken by the assessee before her on merits.

4. We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the records.

5. We first take up the appeals of the Revenue being WTA Nos. 153/Jp./1994 to 159/Jp./1994 in the above seven

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top