SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AHMAD FAREED, H.L.KARWA
Shantilal R. Lunkad – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Wealth-tax Inv. Cir. 3(2) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.G. Nahar,C.M. Bhake

ORDER

Per Ahmad Fareed,Accountant Member. - This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CWT (A) III, Pune, dated 23-12-1997 for assessment year 1992-93.

2. The grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are as under :

1.On the facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions of law, it can be held that the order passed by the Assessing Officer in violation of rules of natural justice is not tenable in law. The order so passed be cancelled.

2.Without prejudice to ground No. 1, on facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions of law it be held that order passed by the Assessing Officer under the designation of Asstt. CIT Inv. Cir. 3(2), Pune, is an order passed without resuming jurisdiction under the relevant provisions of the Act and the order so passed is ab initio void. The order passed by the Assessing Officer be held as null and void.

3.Without prejudice to ground Nos. 1 and 2, on facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions of law, it be held that the value of share considered by the appellant at Rs. 194.85 is the proper value and is in accordance with the provisions of law. The value adopted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top