SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, D.C.AGRAWAL
Manmohansingh Vig – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 1(1) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Kumar Bindal,P.K. Das

ORDER

D.C. Agrawal, Accountant Member.—As these two appeals filed by two different assessees consisting of similar issues, they are clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed off by this common and consolidated order for the sake of convenience.

IT (SS) A. No. 276/Mum./97

In this case, the assessee has raised the following grounds :—

"1. On the facts, in the circumstances of the case and as per law, the learned Assessing Officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 15,70,450 towards the alleged on money paid for acquiring flats and shops in Tulsi Shyam Building for assessment year 1990-91, on the basis of a declaration submitted by the appellant which although was retracted later.

2. On the facts, in the circumstances of the case and as per law, the learned Assessing Officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 2,30,000 based on loose papers 38 to 50 of bundle No. 12 found during the search at the business premises of M/s. S.V. Trading Co.

3. On the facts, in the circumstances of the case and as per law, the learned Assessing Officer erred in making an addition of Rs. 2,70,000 towards interior decoration and household expenses for assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98.

4. On the f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top