B.RAMAKOTAIAH, N.V.VASUDEVAN
Sudhakar M. Shetty – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-13, Mumbai – Respondent
Per B. Ramakotaiah, Accountant Member. - This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 12-1-2010 of CIT(A)-37, Mumbai, relating to assessment year 2007-08.
2. Ground Nos. 1 to 4 raised by the assessee read as follows :
(1)Learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer that the amount received by the appellant on retirement from partnership firm M/s. D.S. Corporation is taxable under the head ‘capital gains’ on the mistaken belief that ‘retirement from partnership’ amounts to ‘transfer’ within the meaning of section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act.
(2)Learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate the facts of the case and the relevant law on the subject.
(3)Learned CIT(A) erred in not following the judgment of Supreme Court and of the jurisdictional Court.
(4)Learned CIT(A) erred in constructing the deed of retirement, under which no transfer had taken place and without transfer there can be no capital gains tax liability.
3. The assessee is an individual. The assessee and one Mr. Rakesh Kumar Wadhwan were desirous of carrying on business of development and construction in partnership with each other of a property situate at Juhu Tara Road, Ju
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.