SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.E.VEERABHADRAPPA, C.L.SETHI
Birlasoft (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Vohra, Mohit Khatri, Neeraj Jain, Pallav Raghuvanshi,Ashok Pandey

ORDER

C.L. Sethi, Judicial Member. - This is direct first appeal, filed by the assessee, against the assessment order dated 27-7-2010 passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) read with section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), after taking approval from the Dispute Resolution Penal (DRP) for the assessment year 2006-07.

2. Ground No. 1 is general in nature and it was agreed by the learned counsel for assessee that needs no adjudication inasmuch as all other grounds taken in the appeal shall take care of the various additions made by the Assessing Officer in the assessment.

3. Ground No. 2 raised by the assessee is as under:-

"2. That the Assessing Officer erred on facts and in law in not appreciating that in absence of any direction issued by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), the following additions/disallowances, proposed in the draft order, could not be made in the order passed under section 144C read with section 143(3) of the Act:

(i)Disallowance of deduction under section 10A of the Act in respect of 3rd floor of (GE-GDC) STPI Unit;

(ii)Disallowance of set-off of profit of STPI Unit, of Rs. 1,38,883 against the loss of other units/income;

(iii)Disallowance of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top