INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Rajpal Yadav, G.E. Veerabhadrappa, JJ.
Laxman Public School Society -Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Income-tax (Exemption) -Respondent
IT APPEAL NOS. 5467 & 5797 (DELHI) OF 2010 AND 2876 (DELHI) OF 2011
Decided On : 14-10-2011
Nitin Gupta, S.B. Gupta,Y.K. Kakkar
Rajpal Yadav, Judicial Member - In this bunch of three appeals at the instance of assessee, ITA No. 5797/Del/2010 is directed against the order of Learned Director of Income-tax (Exemption) dated 29.10.2010 whereas ITA Nos. 5467 & 2876 are filed against the separate orders of Learned CIT(Appeals) dated 30.09.2010 and 28.04.2011 passed for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively.
2. First, we take ITA No. 5797/Del/2010: Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that learned Director of Income-tax (Exemption) has erred in canceling the registration granted under sec. 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by way of the impugned order. He pointed out that the Laxman Public School Society was formed by deed dated 25.5.1979. The main object of the society amongst other objects was to run, maintain, manage and administer Laxman Public School Society in Hauz Khas Area, New Delhi. Apart from this object, it has various other objects of charitable nature which has been provided in the by laws of the society. The assessee has applied for grant of a registration under sec. 12A(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961which was granted to it vide registration No. 2887-88 dated 4.11.1982. Learned Director of Income-tax (Exemption) sought to cancel this registration and issued a notice for this purpose on 15.4.2010. After hearing the assessee, learned Director of Income-tax (Exemption) has passed the impugned order and cancelled the registration w.e.f. assessment year 2007-08. The learned counsel for the assessee on the strength of Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision rendered in the case of DIT (Exemption) v. Mool Chand Khairati Lal Trust [2011]
3. Learned DR on the other hand was unable to controvert the contention of the learned counsel for the assessee. However, she pointed out that Act has been amended w.e.f. Ist of June 2010 meaning thereby the Learned Commissioner has powers to cancel the registration even granted under sec. 12A(a) of the Act after this date. The Learned Commissioner has passed the order on 29.10.2010, therefore, on such date he was having the jurisdiction to cancel the registration. According to the Learned DR, therefore, the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court is not applicable on the facts of the present case.
4. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. The facts of the present case are similar to the facts of Mool Chand Khairati Lal's case. In that case, registration was granted to the assessee on 4.12.1974 under sec. 12A(a)