SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, G.S.PANNU
Mahesh Nemichandra Ganeshwade – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer, Wd. 3(4), Pune – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.U. Pathak,Ms. Ann Kapthuama

ORDER

G.S. Pannu, Accountant Member - Since common issues are involved in the captioned appeals, they were heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity.

2. Since the facts are common and arguments raised by the parties are identical, we shall take up the appeal filed by the assessee Shri Mahesh Nemichandra Ganeshwade (ITA No 594/PN/2010) as a lead case.

3. The Grounds of appeal raised in this appeal are as follows:

"1. The ld CIT(A) erred in holding that capital gain on transfer of land at S. No 48/1, village Bavdhan Khurd, Tal : Haveli, Dist. Pune was assessable in this asst. yea without appreciating that as per law, the same was not taxable in this assessment year.

2. The ld CIT(A) erred in holding that the sale consideration on transfer of land should be adopted at Rs. 4,90,00,000/- as against Rs. 2,50,00,000/- without appreciating that the original sale consideration was only Rs. 2,50,00,000/- and only by way of correction deed in F Y 2007-08 the consideration was increased and hence, there was no reason to adopt the sale consideration at Rs. 4,90,00,000/- as against Rs. 2,50,00,000/- as determined in the original agreement.

3. The l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top