SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

I.P.BANSAL, RAJENDRA
Clariant Chemicals (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD), Range 1(1) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
F.V. Irani,Ajeet Kumar Jain, O.P. Singh

ORDER

I.P. Bansal, Judicial Member :- These are cross appeals and they are directed against order of Ld. CIT(A)-15, Mumbai dated 12/1/2011 for assessment year 2003-04. The grounds of appeal raised by assessee as well as revenue read as under:

Grounds of appeal in ITA No.2393/Mum/201 1(Assessee's appeal):

'On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of Jt. Commissioner of Income-tax in reducing deduction admissible under section 80HHC of the Act on account of following

(i) Reducing 90% of the following income in computing the adjusted profits of the business:

(a) Interest received of Rs. 19,79,277 without netting of the same against the interest paid amounting to Rs.4,06,17,5821- ; and

(b) Duly entitlement pass book receipts of Rs.4,93,68,1361-.

2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax I AO/TPO in making adjustment by applying CUP method in case of exports of manufactured goods on account of following:

(i) Applied Comparable Uncontrolled Price ("CUP")

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top