CUSTOM EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE
B.S.V. Murthy, M.V. RAVINDRAN, JJ.
Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. -Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore -Respondent
STAY ORDER NO. 874/2010 APPLICATION NO. ST/STAY/553/2010 APPEAL NO. ST/1000/2010
Decided On : 25-10-2010
M.V. Ravindran, Judicial Member - This stay petition is filed by the assessee for waiver of pre-deposit of the following amounts :
(i)Service Tax Rs. 9,65,916/-;
(ii)Interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994;
(iii)Penalty of Rs. 200/- per day or 2% of the tax per month whichever is higher under Section 76 of the Act; and
(iv)Penalty of Rs. 9,65,916/- under Section 78 of the Act.
2. Heard both sides and perused the records.
3. The learned Counsel submits that the departmental authority seeks recovery of the service tax on the ground that the appellants being service recipient, receiving taxable services in India, were liable to pay service tax liability. He submits that the provisions of clause 105(zh) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the services obtained by appellants which were categorized under "Online information and database access or retrieval services" will not apply in the present case. He submits that the appellants have already deposited an amount of Rs. 4.92 lakhs against the total demand of Rs. 9,65,916/- and seeks waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amounts involved.
4. Heard the learned DR who reiterates the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals).
5. On a careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides, we find that the issue involved needs a detailed analysis of definition of the services under the category of ‘Online information and database access or retrieval services’ and the activities undertaken by the appellant. It is also undisputed fact that the appellant is recipient of services and the entire activity was conducted at Singapore. At this juncture, we find that the issue needs to be gone into detail and that can be done only at the time of final disposal of the appeal. Accordingly, we are of the considered view that the appellants have not made out prima facie case for complete waiver of the amounts involved. Therefore we direct the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs (Rupees Five lakhs only) after considering the fact that they have already deposited an amount of Rs. 4.92 lakhs, within a period of four weeks from today and report compliance on 24-11-2010 before the Assistant Registrar of this Bench. Subject to such compliance being reported, the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amounts involved is allowed and recovery thereof stayed till the disposal of the appeal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.