SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CUSTOM EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE
DR. S.L. PEERAN , Judicial Member
Bharat Alloys & Energy Ltd. -Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Tirupathi Commissionerate -Respondent
Stay Order No. 35 of 2008 appeal Nos. E/Stay/506 and E/775 of 2007
Decided On : 16-01-2008

Advocates Appeared:
B.N. Seshagiri Rao,Anil Kumar

ORDER

1. The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs. 55,236 towards Service Tax and Rs. 1,104 towards Education Cess and equivalent amount of penalty. The issue pertains to denial of input service tax. The appellant had availed Cenvat Credit relating to the Service Tax paid in respect of the freight charges under the category of Goods Transport Agency. A show-cause notice was issued to appellants proposing disallowance of Cenvat Credit on the ground that the words "Outward Transportation up to the place of removal", which appears in the definition of input service under rule 2(l)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 precludes the eligibility to avail Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on the taxable value of the services of Goods Transport Agency, which relate to transportation/freight charges from the place of removal to the customer’s place. This view in the show-cause notice, has been confirmed in the impugned order despite the fact that the appellants had contended that the issue is covered in their favour by several judgments.

2. The learned Consultant submits that there are contra orders and therefore, this Bench, in the case of India Cements Ltd. v. CCE 2007 (216) ELT 81/ 10 STT 271 (Bang. - CESTAT) has referred the matter to Larger Bench and the judgment is awaited. In view of this position, he prays for waiver of pre-deposit. He submits that all similar matters have been listed for hearing on 29-4-2008 and prays for linking this matter.

3. Heard learned JDR who submits that the contra order relied in the case of India Cements Ltd. (supra) will prevail and in view of this judgment, the appellants be directed to pre-deposit certain amounts to safeguard the revenue interest.

4. On a careful consideration, I notice that this Bench, has expressed its view that the assessee is eligible for input credit services and has referred the matter to the Larger Bench in the case of India Cements Ltd. (supra). The judgment is awaited. In similar cases, the stay applications have been allowed and waiver granted. In view of this position, the stay application is allowed granting waiver of pre-deposit and staying its recovery and the Registry is directed to link this matter with similar pending appeals coming up for hearing on 29-4-2008. Stay application allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top