CUSTOM EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE
DR. S.L. PEERAN , Judicial Member
Bharat Alloys & Energy Ltd. -Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Tirupathi Commissionerate -Respondent
Stay Order No. 35 of 2008 appeal Nos. E/Stay/506 and E/775 of 2007
Decided On : 16-01-2008
1. The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs. 55,236 towards Service Tax and Rs. 1,104 towards Education Cess and equivalent amount of penalty. The issue pertains to denial of input service tax. The appellant had availed Cenvat Credit relating to the Service Tax paid in respect of the freight charges under the category of Goods Transport Agency. A show-cause notice was issued to appellants proposing disallowance of Cenvat Credit on the ground that the words "Outward Transportation up to the place of removal", which appears in the definition of input service under rule 2(l)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 precludes the eligibility to avail Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on the taxable value of the services of Goods Transport Agency, which relate to transportation/freight charges from the place of removal to the customer’s place. This view in the show-cause notice, has been confirmed in the impugned order despite the fact that the appellants had contended that the issue is covered in their favour by several judgments.
2. The learned Consultant submits that there are contra orders and therefore, this Bench, in the case of India Cements Ltd. v. CCE 2007 (216) ELT 81/
3. Heard learned JDR who submits that the contra order relied in the case of India Cements Ltd. (supra) will prevail and in view of this judgment, the appellants be directed to pre-deposit certain amounts to safeguard the revenue interest.
4. On a careful consideration, I notice that this Bench, has expressed its view that the assessee is eligible for input credit services and has referred the matter to the Larger Bench in the case of India Cements Ltd. (supra). The judgment is awaited. In similar cases, the stay applications have been allowed and waiver granted. In view of this position, the stay application is allowed granting waiver of pre-deposit and staying its recovery and the Registry is directed to link this matter with similar pending appeals coming up for hearing on 29-4-2008. Stay application allowed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.