Back
T.K.JAYARAMAN
S. B. Enterprise – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Cochin – Respondent
1. This appeal has been filed against Order-in-Appeal No. 20/2006-ST, dated 15-2-2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Cochin.
2. The appellants are registered as C & F Agents and paid service tax for the period from September 1999 to June 2004. Later on, they came to know about the CESTAT orders dated 27-4-2004, in the case of Mahavir Generics v. CCE 2004 (170) ELT 78/[2007]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
