SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, A.K.SRIVASTAVA
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Jaypee Bela Cement – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Sexena,Anil Balani

ORDER

Per A.K. Srivastava : The appeal is at the instance of the Revenue. The challenge is against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 9.1.2002. The issue arising for consideration is whether lump sum payment of Swiss Francs 9,89,000 payable as consideration for consultancy and engineering services rendered by M/s. Holder Bank Management and Consultancy Ltd., Switzerland (referred to as HMC for the purpose of brevity) is required to be added to the invoice value of the capital goods, raw materials, etc. imported by the appellants under Rule 9 (1) (c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

2. The facts giving rise to this Appeal filed by the Revenue, being aggrieved by the Order-in-Appeal, are that the appellants entered into an agreement with HMC for Consultancy and Engineering Services in the realization of the project, for which lump sum payment of Swiss Francs 9,89,000 was paid by the respondents. In terms of clause 1.2 of the agreement, HMC provided consultancy services in the areas of plant design, production and manufacture techniques. The nature of the services provided were in the areas of preparation of technical concept to meet state-of-the-art technologies,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top