S.L.PEERAN, T.K.JAYARAMAN
Model Buckets & Attachments (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum – Respondent
Per Dr. S.L. Peeran : The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs. 3,38,776/-. Appellant had exported 17 numbers of shovels. They had failed to produce Original ARE-1 as the same had been mis-placed. However they produced collateral evidence in the form of BE (sic - shipping bill). The same has not been accepted on the ground that unless they produced ARE-1 in original/duplicate/triplicate, the proof of export cannot be accepted and hence duty has been demanded on the presumption that goods have not been exported and cleared in the domestic market. Learned counsel submits that the impugned goods were exported. He submits that mere fact of ARE-1 having been misplaced and not produced cannot lead to the conclusion that the goods were cleared in domestic market without payment of duty. He submits that there is no evidence of clandestine removal without payment of duty. He has referred to the documents produced to show the export of the item.
2. Learned DR reiterated the departmental view.
3. We have carefully looked into all the documents. There is also an Inspection Report of Central Excise showing the inspection of the consignment at the factory before the same are left for expor
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.