SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.S.KANG, C.N.B.NAIR
Textile Bearing (KCI) (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Rajkot – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Anand,S. Das

ORDER

Per S.S. Kang : Heard both sides. Appellant filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The dispute in this appeal is in regard to classification of various parts and components of ball bearings such as needles rollers, aluminium cages, inner and outer races, inner and outer rings, lay shaft bushes of different dimensions. There is no dispute that these are parts of ball bearings. Appellant claimed classification under Heading 84.85 of the Central Excise Tariff which covered "machinery parts, not containing electrical connectors, insulators, coils contacts or other electrical features not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter". The revenue claimed classification under Heading 84.82 of the Central Excise Tariff Act which covers "Ball or roller bearings".

2. The contention of the learned counsel is that Heading 84.82 covers ball or roller bearings and parts are no specified there and therefore, they are classifiable under the residual entry 8485.90 which covers machinery parts not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter.

3. Learned SDR relied on the HSN explanatory notes to submit that parts manufactured by the appellant ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top