SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, T.K.JAYARAMAN
Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirupathi – Appellant
Versus
Amara Raja Power Systems (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ganesh Havanur,P.C. Anand

ORDER

Per T.K. Jayaraman : Revenue has filed these appeals against the Orders-in-Appeal Nos. 94 95/2004 dated 15.10.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs Central Excise, Guntur.

2. The brief facts which are relevant for the present appeal are as follows:-

The Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the benefit of exemption Notification 6/2002 dated 01.03.2002 in respect of batteries, which were made by the respondents for use in certain devices covered in list 9 (Sl. No. 237 of the Table). Further, the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the benefit of exemption in respect of FCBC Battery cleared to ISRO without payment of duty under Notification 10/97 even though the respondents did not produce the required certificate at the time of clearance of the goods. He held that the lapse is only of technical nature and substantial benefit of exemption cannot be denied. Revenue has come up before the Tribunal aggrieved over the impugned order of the Commissioner.

3. Shri Ganesh Havanur, the learned SDR, appeared for the Revenue and reiterated the Grounds of Appeal. Shri P.C. Anand, the learned Advocate, appeared for the respondent.

4. We have heard both the parties. The relevant extract of Notif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top